Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2022 11:53:08 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Walbran <qwandor@google.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
        kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] firmware: arm_ffa: Move comment before the field
 it is documenting
Message-ID: <20221201115308.gciyfttnhvz2wcuz@bogus>
References: <20221116170335.2341003-1-qperret@google.com>
 <20221116170335.2341003-3-qperret@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221116170335.2341003-3-qperret@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Quentin,

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 05:03:25PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> 
> This is consistent with the other comments in the struct.
>
Not sure how that happened :). Anyways,

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

I am yet to look at the other patches and I would like to have a setup
to test it as well. So I will look at the other patches and test it later.
The reason for reviewing the first 2 patches moving the code out of the
driver is to check if they can be merged for v6.2 itself.

I may start pushing FF-A v1.1 changes for v6.3 and trying to avoid conflicts
or cross tree dependencies. I know it is quite late for v6.2 but these changes
are trivial and good to get it in for v6.2 if possible.

Will, thoughts ? If you agree, please take it via arm64 for v6.2. I don't
have any FF-A changes for v6.2 ATM, so there should be not conflicts.

--
Regards,
Sudeep