Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2022 15:49:56 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc:     Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Andrew Walbran <qwandor@google.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
        kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] firmware: arm_ffa: Move comment before the field
 it is documenting
Message-ID: <20221201154956.GA28682@willie-the-truck>
References: <20221116170335.2341003-1-qperret@google.com>
 <20221116170335.2341003-3-qperret@google.com>
 <20221201115308.gciyfttnhvz2wcuz@bogus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221201115308.gciyfttnhvz2wcuz@bogus>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:53:08AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 05:03:25PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > 
> > This is consistent with the other comments in the struct.
> >
> Not sure how that happened :). Anyways,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> 
> I am yet to look at the other patches and I would like to have a setup
> to test it as well. So I will look at the other patches and test it later.
> The reason for reviewing the first 2 patches moving the code out of the
> driver is to check if they can be merged for v6.2 itself.
> 
> I may start pushing FF-A v1.1 changes for v6.3 and trying to avoid conflicts
> or cross tree dependencies. I know it is quite late for v6.2 but these changes
> are trivial and good to get it in for v6.2 if possible.
> 
> Will, thoughts ? If you agree, please take it via arm64 for v6.2. I don't
> have any FF-A changes for v6.2 ATM, so there should be not conflicts.

You're asking me to merge my own patches? Of course I can do that :D

Cheers,

Will