Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2022 20:42:30 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc:     Yanhong Wang <yanhong.wang@starfivetech.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] riscv: dts: starfive: visionfive-v2: Add phy
 delay_chain configuration
Message-ID: <Y4kDppmVnL3BV44Z@lunn.ch>
References: <20221201090242.2381-1-yanhong.wang@starfivetech.com>
 <20221201090242.2381-8-yanhong.wang@starfivetech.com>
 <Y4jpDvXo/uj9ygLR@spud>
 <Y4kAyAhBseNmmDo8@spud>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y4kAyAhBseNmmDo8@spud>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 07:30:16PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 05:49:08PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 05:02:42PM +0800, Yanhong Wang wrote:
> > > riscv: dts: starfive: visionfive-v2: Add phy delay_chain configuration
> > > 
> > > Add phy delay_chain configuration to support motorcomm phy driver for
> > > StarFive VisionFive 2 board.
> 
> nit: please re-word this commit next time around to actually say what
> you're doing here. I didn't notice it initially, but this patch is doing
> a lot more than adding `delay_chain` configuration. To my dwmac unaware
> brain, there's nothing hits for that term outside of the changelog :(

Hi Conor

I suspect once we see the documentation of the binding, it will get
rejected and implemented differently. So i would not worry too much
about this at the moment.

      Andrew