Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221123173859.473629-1-dima@arista.com> <20221123173859.473629-2-dima@arista.com>
 <Y4B17nBArWS1Iywo@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <2081d2ac-b2b5-9299-7239-dc4348ec0d0a@arista.com>
 <20221201143134.6bb285d8@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20221201143134.6bb285d8@kernel.org>
From:   Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2022 23:17:11 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJwJo6Z9sTDgOFFrpbrXT6eagtmbB5mhfudG0Osp75J4ipNSqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] jump_label: Prevent key->enabled int overflow
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
        Bob Gilligan <gilligan@arista.com>,
        Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@arista.com>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Salam Noureddine <noureddine@arista.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 22:31, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:28:30 +0000 Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> > > What is the plan for merging this? I'm assuming it would want to go
> > > through the network tree, but as already noted earlier it depends on a
> > > patch I have in tip/locking/core.
> > >
> > > Now I checked, tip/locking/core is *just* that one patch, so it might be
> > > possible to merge that branch and this series into the network tree and
> > > note that during the pull request to Linus.
> >
> > I initially thought it has to go through tip trees because of the
> > dependence, but as you say it's just one patch.
> >
> > I was also asked by Jakub on v4 to wait for Eric's Ack/Review, so once I
> > get a go from him, I will send all 6 patches for inclusion into -net
> > tree, if that will be in time before the merge window.
>
> Looks like we're all set on the networking side (thanks Eric!!)

Thanks!

> Should I pull Peter's branch? Or you want to just resent a patch Peter
> already queued. A bit of an unusual situation..

Either way would work for me.
I can send it in a couple of hours if you prefer instead of pulling the branch.

Thank you,
             Dmitry