Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp1954634rwb; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 03:35:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5bZ8SmLHv4ItDkzS1hmZH4G8co52ytEbMyWlCn3iDviI2dx29MmIX5i50o8vGbrB95wvpZ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2851:b0:78d:88c7:c1bf with SMTP id s17-20020a170906285100b0078d88c7c1bfmr44179572ejc.299.1669980926239; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 03:35:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669980926; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pvG6pbUiA9rDDhUWnzcKRE5bq7dSht98bxTZlsXm9r5k9kVBfz9ZrqTzrAfEIy6n/F de2sD5DmMa8RxcmiKaZhKZEEo0TgClrq9cYbfEotV0N1ey69cj4QfMyuCWCPsl/vuwWM qtCSTJUVxmBjU8cb06/TGsZ41mpOIiA4cC87sKReP9EJ45WkeIqh4iUEmHtLWP9NQ/sC YecIIxbI/eU86h2HCvaxkn3LAOhYQz0Brmj7zSU78EBLJNd4vMuyaK5pr9Ix8czawlpD GhIiNW8qjFx5hUsiqnLRxM4fB0t2QksPGuSPKt1RBlw+fYdKfV63WfNAbURjikmQfPnE PliQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:references:message-id:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=mWApncHNX5N+Ami2eciihV+TlkG0iqwKY79xm+CyD/4=; b=ZIFEKUIO8m3cDVp7p7Pn/Zdo1TDL3RD0o9xr7vchGMPyJnt7kYQmYJ3xx2u6rDQZtj G6zWZ0Fl0mibh9H4J5l/LY36BssGqmbld+vO4miVx5dNfvISyjal/chIYjwV5kE6ZrwB cZKMjnDueSaJ+CF8zgoxZm9Yp7foD7NOZocJBfoHjSI1Vq5AwEa/N/zZfV2T/e8nC+v4 D650qmXo5Qk/D1g9K8vRD/dFyfq2IcTnt/J3dVjKU43Pks3hwnNGnV2NBCNo3f7v8ZaA hODcYcsrRBE9jeNdOgr6jD73hBjQnk2CVKQi+rAgBdCFmTPLDwdr6X+q2eY9O/M2DYtV CV3A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ssi.bg Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e17-20020a056402191100b00461c9bb5205si7006120edz.152.2022.12.02.03.35.05; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 03:35:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ssi.bg Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232068AbiLBL0o (ORCPT + 84 others); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 06:26:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42798 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233170AbiLBL0i (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 06:26:38 -0500 Received: from mg.ssi.bg (mg.ssi.bg [193.238.174.37]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31234CAF80; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 03:26:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mg.ssi.bg (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mg.ssi.bg (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6D3132FA6A; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:26:33 +0200 (EET) Received: from ink.ssi.bg (unknown [193.238.174.40]) by mg.ssi.bg (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0F3232FA69; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:26:32 +0200 (EET) Received: from ja.ssi.bg (unknown [178.16.129.10]) by ink.ssi.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3640D3C0435; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:26:28 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ja.ssi.bg (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 2B2BQQ5M043907; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:26:27 +0200 Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:26:26 +0200 (EET) From: Julian Anastasov To: Dan Carpenter cc: liqiong , Peilin Ye , Simon Horman , Pablo Neira Ayuso , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Yu Zhe Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipvs: initialize 'ret' variable in do_ip_vs_set_ctl() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <7758482-42e8-9057-b568-3980858267f@ssi.bg> References: <20221202032511.1435-1-liqiong@nfschina.com> <9bc0af1a-3cf0-de4e-7073-0f7895b7f6eb@nfschina.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="-1463811672-1864568413-1669980388=:40112" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1463811672-1864568413-1669980388=:40112 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Hello, On Fri, 2 Dec 2022, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 06:18:37PM +0800, liqiong wrote: > > > > > > 在 2022年12月02日 18:07, Dan Carpenter 写道: > > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 11:25:11AM +0800, Li Qiong wrote: > > >> The 'ret' should need to be initialized to 0, in case > > >> return a uninitialized value because no default process > > >> for "switch (cmd)". > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Li Qiong > > > If this is a real bug, then it needs a fixes tag. The fixes tag helps > > > us know whether to back port or not and it also helps in reviewing the > > > patch. Also get_maintainer.pl will CC the person who introduced the > > > bug so they can review it. They are normally the best person to review > > > their own code. > > > > > > Here it would be: > > > Fixes: c5a8a8498eed ("ipvs: Fix uninit-value in do_ip_vs_set_ctl()") > > > > > > Which is strange... Also it suggest that the correct value is -EINVAL > > > and not 0. > > > > > > The thing about uninitialized variable bugs is that Smatch and Clang > > > both warn about them so they tend to get reported pretty quick. > > > Apparently neither Nathan nor I sent forwarded this static checker > > > warning. :/ > > > > > > regards, > > > dan carpenter > > > > It is not a real bug, I use tool (eg: smatch, sparse) to audit the > > code, got this warning and check it, found may be a real problem. > > Yeah. If it is a false positive just ignore it, do not bother to > silence wrong static checker warnings. > > The code in question here is: > > if (len != set_arglen[CMDID(cmd)]) { > > The only time that condition can be true is for the cases in the switch > statement. So Peilin's patch is correct. > > Smatch is bad at understanding arrays so Smatch cannot parse the if > statement above as a human reader can. Yes, no bug in current code. But it is better to return the default switch case with -EINVAL (not 0), in case new commands are added. Such patch should target net-next, it is just for compilers/tools that do not look into set_arglen[]. Regards -- Julian Anastasov ---1463811672-1864568413-1669980388=:40112--