Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp2237702rwb; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 07:15:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4vQecDIkQyRIi857tGuMDDRCCMbRxtznM9wNHrR1QthHJ4bNh3h24NdJWhEBoJRFS/92Vz X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dc0c:0:b0:461:6f87:20bb with SMTP id b12-20020aa7dc0c000000b004616f8720bbmr64450360edu.300.1669994128028; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 07:15:28 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669994128; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dZCyKJt5cL1QxPysd2DbKy4zeP8F+TJ4vIAnLTCT9XWSWRuIIWqWG9CgzQR2CX87aZ 89QQpolK9DUfO8cLHd7mIeTfpwxGkl0yxYe5OMUjSVBy3uC7dEdNI7M2ciuX5fMh2/ei anpRgpJ/jXREB55/PYowuY6nE6W3D45OHDswaPZWezMzvG9tEaQTkfwXInPXMPrqiJBU SeAaHiwIOyPWJoUn0Sd0jFlrnfkS85AhQ/ErT0XejaPCGZ6RL3ij03oBJCBO2JeOS5iy Z6KX4NNYJQ6xTMybkVwS5at4RpZjgqwSTSUDyrNUtcJUhSeqIgQ133C1S5BEbR1V3Ur2 xIDQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=Y3uCyu9VbobJOLb5bg2S4QnzxL/lvHbfdA0L+IHesDA=; b=UfxJXhf/EmDNn0b9JQ2vmCu5xZFFnHi9CXaJi92aZDrMbb4Iqh+TEXhWw4hafNDAjO KF2Zi+IWZvIL7eFb1eDjUUSnktfZOnrgzORKK3zrKqZDRziAMBfESUgqREiunBG+T2c6 HPXau62D6zJBWoYW7y6yO/gkFv+c3HcZduraLujAjxwCc+nz3LcvmbPAV9XKGrzK+3+Y YI2gxNqdLiTilSfBQOfhDZW/eD9039nwbe6zMJf3E1GT6KZzeZSvRnR/Y0mAaqZfUE7j Qiluatgf9dS9+f7UonwpCAo/FNE45xuwZQMGQ4Cq6YrTqyB4Ul/h5yWx1xvamSZFJeK5 wq5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codewreck.org header.s=2 header.b=bKexPzcA; dkim=pass header.i=@codewreck.org header.s=2 header.b=ZyelE6Cv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=codewreck.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bt9-20020a0564020a4900b0045d27c0ba90si5858926edb.577.2022.12.02.07.15.04; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 07:15:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codewreck.org header.s=2 header.b=bKexPzcA; dkim=pass header.i=@codewreck.org header.s=2 header.b=ZyelE6Cv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=codewreck.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233643AbiLBO5k (ORCPT + 82 others); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 09:57:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57014 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233635AbiLBO5i (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 09:57:38 -0500 Received: from nautica.notk.org (ipv6.notk.org [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:7a93::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA865E2FE0; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 06:57:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 108) id D554BC022; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 15:57:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1669993057; bh=Y3uCyu9VbobJOLb5bg2S4QnzxL/lvHbfdA0L+IHesDA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=bKexPzcAkwuHO3UyGyYVEs2AiHJzTvYQcT53TXWB4efz4Lida+bMsi0rv/MoInWFT 1HRW/5l9hzS6MOAGa+kvh+c4gQeYXfWK+HJ5bLcNR+IC5GH92qUxN/9MFgFFRfoAca 7QRBU691Kq0kNi8qgXJSNrPaLEhvfRY+mAyz77tWgDNrOn66nl7mLXkpxD1mcwYQM8 ZO7znXG9+bgJ+1NAuTPJZcQJfwO6WuiZWUePYIJy1SykOZwOUaXnII7CFHmtwT0vWu WkiB4eSeHbB3e7/GcMAF70eEekwqHX56nXydBXPdK8qgcy7aM7sH6Afk4T/jcEFztt QxsADHsH/TS0w== X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from odin.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nautica.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0669FC009; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 15:57:32 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1669993056; bh=Y3uCyu9VbobJOLb5bg2S4QnzxL/lvHbfdA0L+IHesDA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZyelE6CvfHFzERG+lJE9Wsi2BF1WxMQ8j3iiztQPGvdqrE9Mu4llP6SLZlCUe7GSK sgp6/9sDJusoYqM2vf6QtkJdowPbBmZAbXg5+cGXClMXLeeTPJJYqhltO05POeoV5S RE753b2HJ66P1gX+XqXC9B94pnCGXC4zgpGLj1UjBtSPmDlBvinY874J4Yxsd3ngNr cFgQv5/RM8VhbQ95qJedEXED+cX8oMcrIyk54cRcSZJSupoaOMgt5Fbqe7xhPbV7Oo Pyqz46PDzstaexC1mTqWsWcHZ616yo2+2Vx2PGAxyAFEI76ePE6GT8d6lgqLP2Ljoa xcfROEf/peAVw== Received: from localhost (odin.codewreck.org [local]) by odin.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id b911dc5e; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 14:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 23:57:05 +0900 From: asmadeus@codewreck.org To: Schspa Shi , Christian Schoenebeck Cc: ericvh@gmail.com, lucho@ionkov.net, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+8f1060e2aaf8ca55220b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] 9p/fd: set req refcount to zero to avoid uninitialized usage Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4759293.MmlG3nAkEO@silver> <20221201033310.18589-1-schspa@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Schspa Shi wrote on Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:33:10AM +0800: > When the new request allocated, the refcount will be zero if it is resued > one. But if the request is newly allocated from slab, it is not fully > initialized before add it to idr. > > If the p9_read_work got a response before the refcount initiated. It will > use a uninitialized req, which will result in a bad request data struct. > > Here is the logs from syzbot. > > Corrupted memory at 0xffff88807eade00b [ 0xff 0x07 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 > 0x00 0x00 . . . . . . . . ] (in kfence-#110): > p9_fcall_fini net/9p/client.c:248 [inline] > p9_req_put net/9p/client.c:396 [inline] > p9_req_put+0x208/0x250 net/9p/client.c:390 > p9_client_walk+0x247/0x540 net/9p/client.c:1165 > clone_fid fs/9p/fid.h:21 [inline] > v9fs_fid_xattr_set+0xe4/0x2b0 fs/9p/xattr.c:118 > v9fs_xattr_set fs/9p/xattr.c:100 [inline] > v9fs_xattr_handler_set+0x6f/0x120 fs/9p/xattr.c:159 > __vfs_setxattr+0x119/0x180 fs/xattr.c:182 > __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x129/0x5f0 fs/xattr.c:216 > __vfs_setxattr_locked+0x1d3/0x260 fs/xattr.c:277 > vfs_setxattr+0x143/0x340 fs/xattr.c:309 > setxattr+0x146/0x160 fs/xattr.c:617 > path_setxattr+0x197/0x1c0 fs/xattr.c:636 > __do_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:652 [inline] > __se_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:648 [inline] > __ia32_sys_setxattr+0xc0/0x160 fs/xattr.c:648 > do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:112 [inline] > __do_fast_syscall_32+0x65/0xf0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:178 > do_fast_syscall_32+0x33/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:203 > entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x70/0x82 > > Below is a similar scenario, the scenario in the syzbot log looks more > complicated than this one, but this patch can fix it. > > T21124 p9_read_work > ======================== second trans ================================= > p9_client_walk > p9_client_rpc > p9_client_prepare_req > p9_tag_alloc > req = kmem_cache_alloc(p9_req_cache, GFP_NOFS); > tag = idr_alloc > << preempted >> > req->tc.tag = tag; > /* req->[refcount/tag] == uninitialized */ > m->rreq = p9_tag_lookup(m->client, m->rc.tag); > /* increments uninitalized refcount */ > > refcount_set(&req->refcount, 2); > /* cb drops one ref */ > p9_client_cb(req) > /* reader thread drops its ref: > request is incorrectly freed */ > p9_req_put(req) > /* use after free and ref underflow */ > p9_req_put(req) > > To fix it, we can initize the refcount to zero before add to idr. (fixed initialize typo here) > Reported-by: syzbot+8f1060e2aaf8ca55220b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi > > -- > > Changelog: > v1 -> v2: > - Set refcount to fix the problem. > v2 -> v3: > - Comment messages improve as asmadeus suggested. Just a note: when applying a patch with git am, this goes into the commit message -- please include the changelog below the git's three dashes instead (anything between the three dashes and the 'diff --git' below: > --- > net/9p/client.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 12:48:39PM +0100: > > + /* refcount needs to be set to 0 before inserting into the idr > > + * so p9_tag_lookup does not accept a request that is not fully > > + * initialized. refcount_set to 2 below will mark request live. > > + */ > > + refcount_set(&req->refcount, 0); > > I would s/live/ready for being used/, but comment should be clear enough > anyway. I blame golfing to fit into three lines, sorry! Since it was my suggestion, I've taken the liberty to change 'live' to 'ready' as an half step; I think it's clearer than live and probably understandable enough. I've pushed this to my next branch and will submit to Linus for the merge window in a couple of weeks, no point in rushing this to stable unless it gets snatched through the net tree first... -- Dominique