Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Cc:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: riscv: note that counter access is part
 of the uABI
In-Reply-To: <87359wpy9y.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
References: <mhng-72f383f6-a85f-4587-9fa6-f85fb9f27ec8@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
 <87359wpy9y.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Sat, 03 Dec 2022 03:45:35 -0700
Message-ID: <87y1rooje8.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> writes:

> Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> writes:
>> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
>> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
>>
>> I think I merged the last one of these, but if the doc folks pick it up 
>> that's fine with me.  Otherwise I'll take it when it comes back around, 
>> so folks have time to take a look.
>
> "Doc folks" applied it, thanks. :)

Actually, I take that back.  I'd missed this part from the patch:

> Based on an, as yet, unsent v2 of my other uABI changes. I don't expect
> it to be applicable, just getting a patch into patchwork while I don't
> forget about this.

...but b4 happily picked up a couple of *other* patches from this thread
and applied them instead; I've now undone that.  Sorry for the noise.

jon