Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 3 Dec 2022 14:32:59 +0000
From:   Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
To:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>, Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>,
        Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
        Hank <han.lin@mediatek.com>,
        Jonathan JMChen <Jonathan.JMChen@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched/fair: Fixes for capacity inversion detection
Message-ID: <20221203143259.jzyootwv7yjrny3a@airbuntu>
References: <20221127141742.1644023-1-qyousef@layalina.io>
 <20221127141742.1644023-3-qyousef@layalina.io>
 <f06321f0-def6-6f9d-b72f-f700e7e9a60a@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f06321f0-def6-6f9d-b72f-f700e7e9a60a@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 12/01/22 23:39, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 27/11/2022 15:17, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > Traversing the Perf Domains requires rcu_read_lock() to be held and is
> > conditional on sched_energy_enabled(). rcu_read_lock() is held while in
> > load_balance(), add an assert to ensure this is always the case.
> > 
> > Also skip capacity inversion detection for our own pd; which was an
> > error.
> > 
> > Fixes: 44c7b80bffc3 ("sched/fair: Detect capacity inversion")
> > Reported-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef (Google) <qyousef@layalina.io>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 89dadaafc1ec..7c0dd57e562a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -8856,16 +8856,22 @@ static void update_cpu_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> >  	 *   * Thermal pressure will impact all cpus in this perf domain
> >  	 *     equally.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_asym_cpucapacity)) {
> > +	if (sched_energy_enabled()) {
> >  		unsigned long inv_cap = capacity_orig - thermal_load_avg(rq);
> >  		struct perf_domain *pd = rcu_dereference(rq->rd->pd);
> >  
> >  		rq->cpu_capacity_inverted = 0;
> >  
> > +		SCHED_WARN_ON(!rcu_read_lock_held());
> 
> This will trigger in CPU hotplug via build_sched_domains() ->
> update_group_capacity() -> update_cpu_capacity() on an EAS system.

Aargh

> 
> > +
> >  		for (; pd; pd = pd->next) {
> >  			struct cpumask *pd_span = perf_domain_span(pd);
> >  			unsigned long pd_cap_orig, pd_cap;
> >  
> > +			/* We can't be inverted against our own pd */
> > +			if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu_of(rq), pd_span))
> > +				continue;
> > +
> 
> This should fix the issue with `cpu` function parameter in its own PD.

Thanks for confirming!

> 
> >  			cpu = cpumask_any(pd_span);
> >  			pd_cap_orig = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
> >  
> 
> I still don't get the benefit of the CPU capacity inversion patches in
> tip/sched/core which should be fixed by this patch:
> 
> aa69c36f31aa - sched/fair: Consider capacity inversion in
>                util_fits_cpu()
> 44c7b80bffc3 - sched/fair: Detect capacity inversion
> 
> I have to ask again. Why should we use thermal_load_avg() instead of

Is this directed to me?

> arch_scale_thermal_pressure() for a CPUx in `CPU capacity inversion
> state` (i.e. w/ higher `CPU capacity orig` but lower `CPU capacity` than
> CPUy?

If yes, I did answer that here

	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221120213013.t67xisvqxmftri52@airbuntu/


Thanks a lot Dietmar!

--
Qais Yousef