Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp4566968rwb; Sun, 4 Dec 2022 04:32:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5f7F2ordOTq3sEDSN11oPJDxIT2OCt/ns2lFDDXNzUD+sEemDKoCsbBI1Hq4Oyv3xv8O7x X-Received: by 2002:a63:f925:0:b0:470:88:8c18 with SMTP id h37-20020a63f925000000b0047000888c18mr53332378pgi.23.1670157131266; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 04:32:11 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1670157131; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SZtn6JtHYKXAJj8aan7hOHIw07qKCDvh+EYNMsRxo+4skE5unb+9hlQkcFgs2iPqf1 AfR/5Kkoqim0vQHEqT8ZBtkF9Gh14s+bhdupvROJjeF7xVurxdJWx13qL3aEy6XmTx1H +RVzmmVu7zwrx0Sk+e5dQ7o03n85thf66c2RBE169RWRusWvbbuhpu/2QdL3GaB4gkzj fUOYQTrrjdSAHHAM3bjZ0DyANeRRV8UwxnOI8QAu3vSXE3xUsVac51zhB3Bxovb8+Lzq 2iAe71LavEmGAEFIZfoR2nhsSoa2TROvOct2EfoMQvh6BadcRHuh63E1QIPdppuvZ//P yYJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=1JxOufhWg2/q5pW/704na++qHz+lwSgqzP8cOwq2c60=; b=I30c45QBJDcOsc2QpbQ8mfLa6BGafu52E+Fv80V2Yt3pMtoJ4VwiuaklEKuMStOcYF 6lcwsymw4YpU8EnZ+mRdYmQ6BYdW3Aa7CftL06rBZ85fEZ84bqUp7UzaMAwxqF1YOFqZ MFmKH31ehvucTNU+P4T3c00hup838W2tzdk8m4O/R9PEqm5EDBNtm+GbbPfTO0wDAqNq UPWZpYjf15hAXBAtmLVedn3JXFQm/fdBcaSBgxBJgZl4CckOJbxzsq6zzRKzyZUEViUH SjZ4gxC95SiLUQ8ELJrMastRycFnv0DGBHkdit9LeDgQiEb3b9EUI3eFwzaSOtPFWOXs l55w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fDR4FQpw; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p4-20020a056a000b4400b005752121f13dsi13390139pfo.113.2022.12.04.04.32.00; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 04:32:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fDR4FQpw; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230084AbiLDMMj (ORCPT + 84 others); Sun, 4 Dec 2022 07:12:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58760 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229753AbiLDMMh (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2022 07:12:37 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 926AF17ABA for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2022 04:11:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1670155894; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1JxOufhWg2/q5pW/704na++qHz+lwSgqzP8cOwq2c60=; b=fDR4FQpwWwC9cbu6tG7AKw4SqKzP341qBxFy7XBiyefoC9Dfs+9KFiaqKn7Q20wjyVeUgP sUCoNQKMp64vno1lwjq0/hZNjES7KjPYCBEP8ns2cMEmhBGSNRdzvC1YCAT4geilC2NAiA o8Fe3AZKu2efEx3KGaorrKtlhswGALQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-75-5Kn7jIqNMaOlqQDvhbxhBg-1; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 07:11:29 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 5Kn7jIqNMaOlqQDvhbxhBg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90F9F3C0D181; Sun, 4 Dec 2022 12:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-12-63.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.63]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96A6E2166B29; Sun, 4 Dec 2022 12:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 20:11:23 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Wupeng Ma Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org, dennis@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/1] percpu: cleanup invalid assignment to err in pcpu_alloc Message-ID: References: <20221204031430.662169-1-mawupeng1@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221204031430.662169-1-mawupeng1@huawei.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/04/22 at 11:14am, Wupeng Ma wrote: > From: Ma Wupeng > > Assignment to err if is_atomic is true will never be used since warn > message can only be shown if is_atomic is false after label fail. So drop > it. > > Signed-off-by: Ma Wupeng > --- > mm/percpu.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c > index acd78da0493b..df86d79325b2 100644 > --- a/mm/percpu.c > +++ b/mm/percpu.c > @@ -1817,10 +1817,8 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved, > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcpu_lock, flags); > > - if (is_atomic) { > - err = "atomic alloc failed, no space left"; > + if (is_atomic) > goto fail; > - } This is good catch. But I think Dennis may not like this way because he added the message intentionally in commit 11df02bf9bc1 ("percpu: resolve err may not be initialized in pcpu_alloc"). Can we change the conditional checking in fail part as below? diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c index 27697b2429c2..0ac55500fad9 100644 --- a/mm/percpu.c +++ b/mm/percpu.c @@ -1897,7 +1897,7 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved, fail: trace_percpu_alloc_percpu_fail(reserved, is_atomic, size, align); - if (!is_atomic && do_warn && warn_limit) { + if (do_warn && warn_limit) { pr_warn("allocation failed, size=%zu align=%zu atomic=%d, %s\n", size, align, is_atomic, err); dump_stack();