Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp5718925rwb; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 03:12:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf40IIaDQ8nng8E3iH0L9kUAL7pJETUSFqTADMfPYGicOX0/4TNQjngmbEcHtrsXEYMw/Ok+ X-Received: by 2002:a63:ec47:0:b0:46f:c465:5848 with SMTP id r7-20020a63ec47000000b0046fc4655848mr56300045pgj.148.1670238778041; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 03:12:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1670238778; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ek8ff/Q1YK8Ogp12sVcYWhLCYNFDKaBhF51RM9Xxv4gj+F5U3UwcYmpPdfNIe1OJUn /Ie8X0RC0mTUwP+Ifu5WuGE/1koY5DcHphZRWnSorLuSm71q7JmzVq7HteDguCEp2qkZ EwATUrDDCextw5htELUP+c1lD+YKzRKMTo6bG5ShU++r08Cm7RTvzl9qS1JDcUNmPs4e t8dPJ7Is1S7W8ymfToC4XP4ejPvw/iAXAbVlvt5dIBFrcWKpBy5hVIkhshxxa1Ryp5IX sf+0wTRCFzAnR5HA8ucXF/WZ1Z2jkaDapKXDAizU5GA6PsHoWd51LDijNZXDyUspy0V+ iIeQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=lXJmghAsht5tz8wG8kD9HLIDe/Py8gVGaXfYmN/c9Og=; b=pI1R20FbbxbTke3CrxFRCptA08/ROJSrLM0bHcsY4mRhRlYvK3cAKYtwQ1TwAa2jE0 ooi+obN8TrXsoHbo0lnk8c5bcwz4/Oss6/mqa03IQrjV7WbH9KtNLoijbgkRp+uFVxNa gthph7+ejCqRQ9jQXwo2anDkaO+qfw/5cxu16PDA5G9aHDC76Og5uqN/Wpeu8uldj6/z DJNdHoHhwXDAGPmS286TWcFOtMfk92CGQFKXJRZhNz4oLT++xJ/chopOW5bGiHXdODEP ZQ5Jn+NrNiUgsncubXPnC9znvxpX0iqrWRN/s364LvoYFJheQrsOuzJnVOaMR7g+dALi ibIA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=EXTNj0gg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o21-20020a170902779500b001870edc9b10si13636598pll.380.2022.12.05.03.12.46; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 03:12:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=EXTNj0gg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230483AbiLEKpF (ORCPT + 82 others); Mon, 5 Dec 2022 05:45:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44688 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230006AbiLEKpD (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2022 05:45:03 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA654DF5E; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 02:45:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98D2CB80E9C; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 10:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25013C433D6; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 10:45:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1670237100; bh=x0dL013fJAgeF/jujKI7430NVHO0hswW/W9LQgRn5FM=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=EXTNj0ggksv6L22rmrrpAI3J4B5C6S3QkAvuZXiHg8WA3ynBlTEgyV/MTBDgJDsU4 UnuKdgTVgReaOaX47PojMQxDENf/IDvMRUs8mTjby2Q+Txo16tqnOYc4qpX6R2so0T 4Y9u0fovv5DCO+u2t/EpBV3GSoedibNgk+Fu0tOlFfINrtC2tkbX+reE7ImO0E429x l8gQU8wK+qYJWXlz4iKyB2kT/0zLWUCjRqnyMRWSyAQalEhq6BDXkPSSA6sVXbkBGC ktBbIF5J9nLWG1CSvGIDQner1pbs0SOnyG2Ttto0STFAdgCCNJojR5X+9Ahhm9Gy2Z HETu79FrFAeaQ== Received: by mail-ot1-f44.google.com with SMTP id v19-20020a9d5a13000000b0066e82a3872dso4946253oth.5; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 02:45:00 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkb1vcCIReMTmjOO9vYdpo9Zh/pzom0T9EXOoo0URWTyde6BFFT Ao0qHZ9Fyk79u5l9jpQ/1ZqgqBmx5oY6aLG2PHo= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5d04:0:b0:66b:85b7:ac37 with SMTP id b4-20020a9d5d04000000b0066b85b7ac37mr34465693oti.363.1670237099254; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 02:44:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221201160724.2593341-1-cccheng@synology.com> In-Reply-To: <20221201160724.2593341-1-cccheng@synology.com> From: Filipe Manana Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 10:44:23 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: refuse to remount read-write with unsupported compat-ro features To: Chung-Chiang Cheng Cc: clm@fb.com, josef@toxicpanda.com, dsterba@suse.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shepjeng@gmail.com, kernel@cccheng.net, Johnny Chang Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 5:07 PM Chung-Chiang Cheng wrote: > > btrfs with unsupported compat-ro features can only be mounted as > read-only, but we can make it read-write indirectly through remount. > Just add the missing check to refuse it. > > mount -o ro /dev/vdb /mnt > mount -o remount,rw /mnt > > Reported-by: Johnny Chang > Signed-off-by: Chung-Chiang Cheng > --- > fs/btrfs/super.c | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c > index 5942b9384088..45836a426499 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c > @@ -1991,6 +1991,8 @@ static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) > unsigned old_flags = sb->s_flags; > unsigned long old_opts = fs_info->mount_opt; > unsigned long old_compress_type = fs_info->compress_type; > + u64 compat_ro = btrfs_super_compat_ro_flags(fs_info->super_copy); > + u64 compat_ro_unsupp = compat_ro & ~BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP; > u64 old_max_inline = fs_info->max_inline; > u32 old_thread_pool_size = fs_info->thread_pool_size; > u32 old_metadata_ratio = fs_info->metadata_ratio; > @@ -2107,6 +2109,13 @@ static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) > if (ret) > goto restore; > } else { > + if (compat_ro_unsupp) { > + btrfs_err(fs_info, > + "cannot remount read-write because of unknown compat_ro features (0x%llx)", > + compat_ro); > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto restore; > + } Wasn't this already done by the following commit? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=81d5d61454c365718655cfc87d8200c84e25d596 Thanks. > if (BTRFS_FS_ERROR(fs_info)) { > btrfs_err(fs_info, > "Remounting read-write after error is not allowed"); > -- > 2.34.1 >