Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221109113724.519021-1-emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
 <20221109120102.ylnseq2w33rvt7fz@pengutronix.de> <CAJM55Z-EVXB6FTWwh_vY_B3LoVv+b7TCQCE7asB8G8wkEwui_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20221109153311.cszr7fgfmyelwra3@pengutronix.de> <CAJM55Z8vpJ0XtQqnsFMLE4rkyV11ePbNjtYx0u4pgM9-MT=Kvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20221128082441.wsqcpuxqk6cynako@pengutronix.de>
In-Reply-To: <20221128082441.wsqcpuxqk6cynako@pengutronix.de>
From:   Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2022 14:49:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJM55Z8eGCL9LyPBzgV3JW+qEZAoMLn3v7nkwwoMVGTjEg6vjA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pwm: sifive: Always let the first pwm_apply_state succeed
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc:     =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
        "Wesley W. Terpstra" <wesley@sifive.com>,
        linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 09:24, Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 06:41:06PM +0100, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 at 16:33, Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig
> > <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 01:45:43PM +0100, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> > > > How about we merge this bug fix that can easily be backported first
> > > > and then look at how it should be handled properly?
> > >
> > > I thought it wouldn't be that hard to do it right from the start,
> > > but I admit it's harder than I expected to get right. My prototype lo=
oks
> > > as follows:
> >
> > This works for me (modulo the two extra {'s). I'd still prefer merging
>
> Yeah, didn't even try to compile it.
>
> > the simpler version and then this on top for ease of backporting, but
> > as long as the race is fixed I'm fine. Will you send a cleaned up
> > version of this?
>
> I'd let Thierry decide what he want here. Depending on his choice I can
> clean up my suggestion (inclusive compile test) on the then relevant
> state of the driver.

@Thierry, it seems this is stuck on some opinion from you.

/Emil
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig       =
     |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ =
|