Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp6526423rwb; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 13:44:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4Ymz07gXtsVjGT58xdUKgQ8JSY7H1Ik0va+oVBUOK2RKBZGQ09Oe7qC+uEZIh7bn0JavKV X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2b91:b0:457:23cb:20ab with SMTP id fj17-20020a0564022b9100b0045723cb20abmr10232158edb.254.1670276655965; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 13:44:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1670276655; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nAQ/w1zfliILiGKscgR8mgDGHAGklHCcF5hdC9YXxAhfhA5XhsrzK/tDp5ukA0LYZv CdIc/pGyDsx0VKl5L1fpf5+WxF8bdevb0Pr3blcnRmfzSTYOWyQkaO9Igd3A4s9TzgMV iunvFTauHHtovAiMpVMDOir5YERr6ysxVsc67bOjB/kyn+wwQIPDJBAyIDvaTFNcLB6K kWokG5KOawfyzjVZ8LlMhj4rKpe00lJT2ZDc9k0VEGRsPLyS5x+3kihZd83HzLL+QEqq H5pH+L4BvdmlZZI/Be5yPeM1XHjAb4+lWfrieCWTBmhkcIf6P6JsmmHaoCOtUCFncQN9 i+rQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=CWvVJvThv0gHUKwPAYQk+SufNWdeMUwtwKNDHUXMgJo=; b=HGIPhDk3rfdvyHG+cs9JQ16BZgpFqUYGN+pkqN5cZt02wbOZB/kfmuULrQ2eoe3Q28 2Y4XYmruBWS1a5R7OTCJ33789LUud521oWcKquIDfptnQPvWjd2fCNFD05SrEBXJvt71 xlJOpRG2affNNfANC3rUlgRs0fXJmji3vCGQlqBaqr92JnGElY1sWr8KXMNy5DjJvbMS Mw41HAeumDilQNO6SooNhoEIZcbQrF6dVHeVxh+0pZ6rVGz1mudi8rhbwEmDlG9Tbzm8 Kb01CqXdJjHBVuoPrdwsJpi0KLczhZ2i22ut82yMj3KzVNthETBHVMTLU3zG3I0kBq0R o0ew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=OcIx5RVe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ne37-20020a1709077ba500b007bdf57f885esi13995031ejc.37.2022.12.05.13.43.50; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 13:44:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=OcIx5RVe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231908AbiLEVFh (ORCPT + 80 others); Mon, 5 Dec 2022 16:05:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59784 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233854AbiLEVEu (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2022 16:04:50 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2D7625FD; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 13:04:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id r18so11549589pgr.12; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 13:04:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CWvVJvThv0gHUKwPAYQk+SufNWdeMUwtwKNDHUXMgJo=; b=OcIx5RVeRcYhCg+P/yyeEn2/AXirrXP0zxi2pf1d/28freUOc/av5SpULT83ZYM8AR myc4dnMmPvHE3jr9vcMMddRLLxkacLFeezE+c+0Zlk3o2XgIC/SMH/vIw+KdFzsH+uLv WslAdKHSS5vTfioTTvoXFJtUWq6WhztGkGjsEKhAgabT7R5Ieb8WVI6xl33PlPHqcfIi 5B0Kux04QuiFV9IqZsVC19eU6rs/NgXg47yfzs8oRnuZ1wuvub8h8tAQVBb/ZvGALZMP YvJcH+YOzWY8rXNN7G7QDkbWwWbaUwJz7IUH44ZL4cbmG8Jok0SlgS1GSdcQQ517m8Db DWkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=CWvVJvThv0gHUKwPAYQk+SufNWdeMUwtwKNDHUXMgJo=; b=xFHWcvoDXBnMThrBVG2d6bGti0DSV+nSW1RMSEAwaAqTYIRTYHEcfY3xzoVoNCAp3c GXhfdRDQnOxGW9azSiEN2ucVPv7uzKNVNnjRoS1YFhpQfpYasxjqJdBjRk6Nzv4Vzge6 tCwMuwj/lzxK7OznejePIfp5Ee15nnX08jgdtFfUZ6nCpzlQxO9VpCWo4Km+qGY0eAyM 9PXIFhPklfDl9JXg2G1boQ31r2w4X5qzYR4JmIhRBOj57bSl3D20xZxhiW1PHu+SaWQ6 a1UZ5S2FJ6gUKnLucMo3SvC1m+eZw9hecutNL0hOdHyGNr36A9iGXe4hdLho10db5jmg bRmw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmS/LewMSUQKIHrtlpmZGgy+hQZ54HchYPw8mSGPx/427gbRuud Xe2qjW3jjqt27/TNzUD59ho= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:4286:b0:56d:3de3:c525 with SMTP id bx6-20020a056a00428600b0056d3de3c525mr63424774pfb.41.1670274271914; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 13:04:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([192.55.54.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e4-20020a056a0000c400b0057709fce782sm1860045pfj.54.2022.12.05.13.04.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 05 Dec 2022 13:04:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 13:04:30 -0800 From: Isaku Yamahata To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , Matthew Rosato , Eric Farman , Vitaly Kuznetsov , David Woodhouse , Paul Durrant , James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Oliver Upton , Atish Patra , David Hildenbrand , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuan Yao , Cornelia Huck , Isaku Yamahata , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Fabiano Rosas , Michael Ellerman , Kai Huang , Chao Gao , Thomas Gleixner , isaku.yamahata@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 39/50] KVM: x86: Move CPU compat checks hook to kvm_x86_ops (from kvm_x86_init_ops) Message-ID: <20221205210430.GB3630770@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20221130230934.1014142-1-seanjc@google.com> <20221130230934.1014142-40-seanjc@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221130230934.1014142-40-seanjc@google.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:09:23PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Move the .check_processor_compatibility() callback from kvm_x86_init_ops > to kvm_x86_ops to allow a future patch to do compatibility checks during > CPU hotplug. > > Do kvm_ops_update() before compat checks so that static_call() can be > used during compat checks. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h | 1 + > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++- > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 5 +++-- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 16 +++++++-------- > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 31 +++++++++++------------------- > 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h > index abccd51dcfca..dba2909e5ae2 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ BUILD_BUG_ON(1) > * to make a definition optional, but in this case the default will > * be __static_call_return0. > */ > +KVM_X86_OP(check_processor_compatibility) > KVM_X86_OP(hardware_enable) > KVM_X86_OP(hardware_disable) > KVM_X86_OP(hardware_unsetup) > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index d79aedf70908..ba74fea6850b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -1518,6 +1518,8 @@ static inline u16 kvm_lapic_irq_dest_mode(bool dest_mode_logical) > struct kvm_x86_ops { > const char *name; > > + int (*check_processor_compatibility)(void); > + > int (*hardware_enable)(void); > void (*hardware_disable)(void); > void (*hardware_unsetup)(void); > @@ -1729,7 +1731,6 @@ struct kvm_x86_nested_ops { > }; > > struct kvm_x86_init_ops { > - int (*check_processor_compatibility)(void); > int (*hardware_setup)(void); > unsigned int (*handle_intel_pt_intr)(void); > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > index 9f94efcb9aa6..c2e95c0d9fd8 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static bool kvm_is_svm_supported(void) > return true; > } > > -static int __init svm_check_processor_compat(void) > +static int svm_check_processor_compat(void) > { > if (!kvm_is_svm_supported()) > return -EIO; > @@ -4695,6 +4695,8 @@ static int svm_vm_init(struct kvm *kvm) > static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __initdata = { > .name = KBUILD_MODNAME, > > + .check_processor_compatibility = svm_check_processor_compat, > + > .hardware_unsetup = svm_hardware_unsetup, > .hardware_enable = svm_hardware_enable, > .hardware_disable = svm_hardware_disable, > @@ -5079,7 +5081,6 @@ static __init int svm_hardware_setup(void) > > static struct kvm_x86_init_ops svm_init_ops __initdata = { > .hardware_setup = svm_hardware_setup, > - .check_processor_compatibility = svm_check_processor_compat, > > .runtime_ops = &svm_x86_ops, > .pmu_ops = &amd_pmu_ops, > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > index 2a8a6e481c76..6416ed5b7f89 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c > @@ -2520,8 +2520,7 @@ static bool cpu_has_perf_global_ctrl_bug(void) > return false; > } > > -static __init int adjust_vmx_controls(u32 ctl_min, u32 ctl_opt, > - u32 msr, u32 *result) > +static int adjust_vmx_controls(u32 ctl_min, u32 ctl_opt, u32 msr, u32 *result) > { > u32 vmx_msr_low, vmx_msr_high; > u32 ctl = ctl_min | ctl_opt; > @@ -2539,7 +2538,7 @@ static __init int adjust_vmx_controls(u32 ctl_min, u32 ctl_opt, > return 0; > } > > -static __init u64 adjust_vmx_controls64(u64 ctl_opt, u32 msr) > +static u64 adjust_vmx_controls64(u64 ctl_opt, u32 msr) > { > u64 allowed; > > @@ -2548,8 +2547,8 @@ static __init u64 adjust_vmx_controls64(u64 ctl_opt, u32 msr) > return ctl_opt & allowed; > } > > -static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf, > - struct vmx_capability *vmx_cap) > +static int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf, > + struct vmx_capability *vmx_cap) > { > u32 vmx_msr_low, vmx_msr_high; > u32 _pin_based_exec_control = 0; > @@ -2710,7 +2709,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf, > return 0; > } > > -static bool __init kvm_is_vmx_supported(void) > +static bool kvm_is_vmx_supported(void) > { > if (!cpu_has_vmx()) { > pr_err("CPU doesn't support VMX\n"); > @@ -2726,7 +2725,7 @@ static bool __init kvm_is_vmx_supported(void) > return true; > } > > -static int __init vmx_check_processor_compat(void) > +static int vmx_check_processor_compat(void) > { > struct vmcs_config vmcs_conf; > struct vmx_capability vmx_cap; > @@ -8104,6 +8103,8 @@ static void vmx_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm) > static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __initdata = { > .name = KBUILD_MODNAME, > > + .check_processor_compatibility = vmx_check_processor_compat, > + > .hardware_unsetup = vmx_hardware_unsetup, > > .hardware_enable = vmx_hardware_enable, > @@ -8501,7 +8502,6 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void) > } > > static struct kvm_x86_init_ops vmx_init_ops __initdata = { > - .check_processor_compatibility = vmx_check_processor_compat, > .hardware_setup = hardware_setup, > .handle_intel_pt_intr = NULL, > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > index 5551f3552f08..ee9af412ffd4 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > @@ -9279,12 +9279,7 @@ static inline void kvm_ops_update(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops) > kvm_pmu_ops_update(ops->pmu_ops); > } > > -struct kvm_cpu_compat_check { > - struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops; > - int *ret; > -}; > - > -static int kvm_x86_check_processor_compatibility(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops) > +static int kvm_x86_check_processor_compatibility(void) > { > struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(smp_processor_id()); > > @@ -9294,19 +9289,16 @@ static int kvm_x86_check_processor_compatibility(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops) > __cr4_reserved_bits(cpu_has, &boot_cpu_data)) > return -EIO; > > - return ops->check_processor_compatibility(); > + return static_call(kvm_x86_check_processor_compatibility)(); > } > > -static void kvm_x86_check_cpu_compat(void *data) > +static void kvm_x86_check_cpu_compat(void *ret) > { > - struct kvm_cpu_compat_check *c = data; > - > - *c->ret = kvm_x86_check_processor_compatibility(c->ops); > + *(int *)ret = kvm_x86_check_processor_compatibility(); > } > > static int __kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops) > { > - struct kvm_cpu_compat_check c; > u64 host_pat; > int r, cpu; > > @@ -9377,12 +9369,12 @@ static int __kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops) > if (r != 0) > goto out_mmu_exit; > > - c.ret = &r; > - c.ops = ops; > + kvm_ops_update(ops); > + > for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { > - smp_call_function_single(cpu, kvm_x86_check_cpu_compat, &c, 1); > + smp_call_function_single(cpu, kvm_x86_check_cpu_compat, &r, 1); Ah, here pointer makes sense. So I scratch the comment on the previous patch. Thanks, > if (r < 0) > - goto out_hardware_unsetup; > + goto out_unwind_ops; > } > > /* > @@ -9390,8 +9382,6 @@ static int __kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops) > * absolutely necessary, as most operations from this point forward > * require unwinding. > */ > - kvm_ops_update(ops); > - > kvm_timer_init(); > > if (pi_inject_timer == -1) > @@ -9427,8 +9417,9 @@ static int __kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops) > kvm_init_msr_list(); > return 0; > > -out_hardware_unsetup: > - ops->runtime_ops->hardware_unsetup(); > +out_unwind_ops: > + kvm_x86_ops.hardware_enable = NULL; > + static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_unsetup)(); > out_mmu_exit: > kvm_mmu_vendor_module_exit(); > out_free_percpu: > -- > 2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog > -- Isaku Yamahata