Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2022 15:16:23 -0600
From:   Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: aoss: Add compatible for SM8550
Message-ID: <20221205211623.extu4b22fsowilyd@builder.lan>
References: <20221116113128.2655441-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org>
 <adc327c7-9e99-4f2d-9641-2981b380ee47@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <adc327c7-9e99-4f2d-9641-2981b380ee47@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 12:43:26PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/11/2022 12:31, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > Document the compatible for SM8550.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> 
> Why this is not part of other SoC patches? I just received many single
> patches for this SM8550 topic. All these should be set of few series,
> not 10 or more...
> 

Because these patches are independent of each other and done in this way
means the maintainer can merge each piece on its own. I much prefer this
over having these series with 20+ patches being sent over and over
because one of the patches is getting feedback.

Regards,
Bjorn

> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>