Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp7367102rwb; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 05:02:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4gzIjB8GQJJfeKWs1APHjKW8VgktXUUqdtVeCZ/eDXBBBf/0YATZJZZrTZ1WUn0e45/mfb X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d346:b0:189:efa1:2953 with SMTP id l6-20020a170902d34600b00189efa12953mr1045269plk.97.1670331747293; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 05:02:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1670331747; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=C7sDvqcz9HixEQAa7o24W0OXKgWB9urB71IzggDAt52gFDPo4NNT7jHl8axyi/1Pmc ADSVlSZ72bcKl2l2ktpkYKpgb9lNvdy7am6cWBjVYpBvBzbdCzpr8Gqqd9jX2WPJ6XP2 YQOjVoJRfzMSAGCNdVfyxvpPIf8rHSo3EDD6+CVeXYJsTc0upGdgehB6FmpRcMM9IfvS pBw3gRMW7o09dkJ3AudWb5ImG4Ltdt8M7x7Wo7GeOP5qMbsouC/NqEUFveQ1bDA9E+8K esyRILFySwfus3CZe0lucKdm3IZwJHM7Mj2n78HpLYbp9BunrhwwUveaWxR8pTXqswxx DyXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=AWdqfEUjrTuVjHA/y8v5MAtBk7ImaQk0aL0UeeWFHzc=; b=bjG4Pz2UTiLFpO/a+kcywIDNNXunulKd4II4SPzWMLDmvvzGx5mA0iD71R+x0AGapb UL+/8g4y4ed8yUqaYz5czsF3yQUs+4dP4O7vdWAS+15gNLjWUCCBXYDjU+dowaJEylie 0fI67CDLkngVgInJmqavFn0+EYnnC2FJVDYUdLtMAwZUJDKe4SJvfKhIL0Ypjn+TYyRH JkSBMFdKs23TCYmf+GqV96oi/RBtQExA/eSqNLBL37Cob3pLBJu564dq6tXsLxE5lQ3Z 5bTto921MTGzv9yhSzMvC8G3hz9gq0GmuV3K9OapjuqtffH+bY6aD1s8FL3g0KJwFx33 fyjQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=ejjlZ6fr; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f11-20020a63510b000000b0046141525a73si17054362pgb.464.2022.12.06.05.02.14; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 05:02:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=ejjlZ6fr; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235369AbiLFMAP (ORCPT + 79 others); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 07:00:15 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52142 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235181AbiLFL70 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 06:59:26 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F362528E3F; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 03:58:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1670327910; x=1701863910; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=imlNdXA4iJKZ9kmncFn/vB9V/RKmf+zdzZLiNWUUJKA=; b=ejjlZ6frlnUAEmgPBHO38FgM/BGY+JeYxrJSTTN9sktJOXdG9qQo+dVf 4sloBBrCnRWimyTR61ksikJozO0VDqAZvLX3MvCHB5pvFXDkm+n/SiQ8r lBYv4BefbDuiSHClF6t+FLmgJR5fuNvR5pAW5bIANBlZzfe1vaR1zAu6N UhoP+BjkvEgsb/eAQgJvTxPG8MNoKQtzrCj7BsbM6WspGp+3pLj0xCoVp D+6ldX+qeGi44c6NiIf4+IA55VjYC5fsi5X8aNqIpIy3vdW5D4WAsxODW OiiGXRwAk4c2YUdymRKYDjs6M3mYgmD1hp4YB+Xz1Xf1MvcMXz75J7Mty g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10552"; a="317746876" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,222,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="317746876" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Dec 2022 03:58:28 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10552"; a="639850271" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,222,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="639850271" Received: from chaop.bj.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.240.193.75]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2022 03:58:16 -0800 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 19:53:56 +0800 From: Chao Peng To: Fuad Tabba Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Arnd Bergmann , Naoya Horiguchi , Miaohe Lin , x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , Hugh Dickins , Jeff Layton , "J . Bruce Fields" , Andrew Morton , Shuah Khan , Mike Rapoport , Steven Price , "Maciej S . Szmigiero" , Vlastimil Babka , Vishal Annapurve , Yu Zhang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , luto@kernel.org, jun.nakajima@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, david@redhat.com, aarcange@redhat.com, ddutile@redhat.com, dhildenb@redhat.com, Quentin Perret , Michael Roth , mhocko@suse.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/9] KVM: Extend the memslot to support fd-based private memory Message-ID: <20221206115356.GA1216605@chaop.bj.intel.com> Reply-To: Chao Peng References: <20221202061347.1070246-1-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> <20221202061347.1070246-4-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 09:03:11AM +0000, Fuad Tabba wrote: > Hi Chao, > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:18 AM Chao Peng wrote: > > > > In memory encryption usage, guest memory may be encrypted with special > > key and can be accessed only by the guest itself. We call such memory > > private memory. It's valueless and sometimes can cause problem to allow > > userspace to access guest private memory. This new KVM memslot extension > > allows guest private memory being provided through a restrictedmem > > backed file descriptor(fd) and userspace is restricted to access the > > bookmarked memory in the fd. > > > > This new extension, indicated by the new flag KVM_MEM_PRIVATE, adds two > > additional KVM memslot fields restricted_fd/restricted_offset to allow > > userspace to instruct KVM to provide guest memory through restricted_fd. > > 'guest_phys_addr' is mapped at the restricted_offset of restricted_fd > > and the size is 'memory_size'. > > > > The extended memslot can still have the userspace_addr(hva). When use, a > > single memslot can maintain both private memory through restricted_fd > > and shared memory through userspace_addr. Whether the private or shared > > part is visible to guest is maintained by other KVM code. > > > > A restrictedmem_notifier field is also added to the memslot structure to > > allow the restricted_fd's backing store to notify KVM the memory change, > > KVM then can invalidate its page table entries or handle memory errors. > > > > Together with the change, a new config HAVE_KVM_RESTRICTED_MEM is added > > and right now it is selected on X86_64 only. > > > > To make future maintenance easy, internally use a binary compatible > > alias struct kvm_user_mem_region to handle both the normal and the > > '_ext' variants. > > > > Co-developed-by: Yu Zhang > > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang > > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng > > Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba > > Tested-by: Fuad Tabba > > V9 of this patch [*] had KVM_CAP_PRIVATE_MEM, but it's not in this > patch series anymore. Any reason you removed it, or is it just an > omission? We had some discussion in v9 [1] to add generic memory attributes ioctls and KVM_CAP_PRIVATE_MEM can be implemented as a new KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE flag via KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES() ioctl [2]. The api doc has been updated: +- KVM_MEM_PRIVATE, if KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE is supported (see + KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES ioctl) ?? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Y2WB48kD0J4VGynX@google.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20221202061347.1070246-3-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com/ Thanks, Chao > > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20221025151344.3784230-3-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com/ > > Thanks, > /fuad > > > --- > > Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig | 2 ++ > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +- > > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 8 ++++-- > > include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ > > virt/kvm/Kconfig | 3 +++ > > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > > 7 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > > index bb2f709c0900..99352170c130 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > > @@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@ yet and must be cleared on entry. > > :Capability: KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY > > :Architectures: all > > :Type: vm ioctl > > -:Parameters: struct kvm_userspace_memory_region (in) > > +:Parameters: struct kvm_userspace_memory_region(_ext) (in) > > :Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error > > > > :: > > @@ -1332,9 +1332,18 @@ yet and must be cleared on entry. > > __u64 userspace_addr; /* start of the userspace allocated memory */ > > }; > > > > + struct kvm_userspace_memory_region_ext { > > + struct kvm_userspace_memory_region region; > > + __u64 restricted_offset; > > + __u32 restricted_fd; > > + __u32 pad1; > > + __u64 pad2[14]; > > + }; > > + > > /* for kvm_memory_region::flags */ > > #define KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES (1UL << 0) > > #define KVM_MEM_READONLY (1UL << 1) > > + #define KVM_MEM_PRIVATE (1UL << 2) > > > > This ioctl allows the user to create, modify or delete a guest physical > > memory slot. Bits 0-15 of "slot" specify the slot id and this value > > @@ -1365,12 +1374,29 @@ It is recommended that the lower 21 bits of guest_phys_addr and userspace_addr > > be identical. This allows large pages in the guest to be backed by large > > pages in the host. > > > > -The flags field supports two flags: KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES and > > -KVM_MEM_READONLY. The former can be set to instruct KVM to keep track of > > -writes to memory within the slot. See KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG ioctl to know how to > > -use it. The latter can be set, if KVM_CAP_READONLY_MEM capability allows it, > > -to make a new slot read-only. In this case, writes to this memory will be > > -posted to userspace as KVM_EXIT_MMIO exits. > > +kvm_userspace_memory_region_ext struct includes all fields of > > +kvm_userspace_memory_region struct, while also adds additional fields for some > > +other features. See below description of flags field for more information. > > +It's recommended to use kvm_userspace_memory_region_ext in new userspace code. > > + > > +The flags field supports following flags: > > + > > +- KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES to instruct KVM to keep track of writes to memory > > + within the slot. For more details, see KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG ioctl. > > + > > +- KVM_MEM_READONLY, if KVM_CAP_READONLY_MEM allows, to make a new slot > > + read-only. In this case, writes to this memory will be posted to userspace as > > + KVM_EXIT_MMIO exits. > > + > > +- KVM_MEM_PRIVATE, if KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE is supported (see > > + KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES ioctl), to indicate a new slot has private > > + memory backed by a file descriptor(fd) and userspace access to the fd may be > > + restricted. Userspace should use restricted_fd/restricted_offset in the > > + kvm_userspace_memory_region_ext to instruct KVM to provide private memory > > + to guest. Userspace should guarantee not to map the same host physical address > > + indicated by restricted_fd/restricted_offset to different guest physical > > + addresses within multiple memslots. Failed to do this may result undefined > > + behavior. > > > > When the KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU capability is available, changes in the backing of > > the memory region are automatically reflected into the guest. For example, an > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig > > index a8e379a3afee..690cb21010e7 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig > > @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ config KVM > > select INTERVAL_TREE > > select HAVE_KVM_PM_NOTIFIER if PM > > select HAVE_KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES > > + select HAVE_KVM_RESTRICTED_MEM if X86_64 > > + select RESTRICTEDMEM if HAVE_KVM_RESTRICTED_MEM > > help > > Support hosting fully virtualized guest machines using hardware > > virtualization extensions. You will need a fairly recent > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > index 7f850dfb4086..9a07380f8d3c 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > @@ -12224,7 +12224,7 @@ void __user * __x86_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int id, gpa_t gpa, > > } > > > > for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++) { > > - struct kvm_userspace_memory_region m; > > + struct kvm_user_mem_region m; > > > > m.slot = id | (i << 16); > > m.flags = 0; > > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h > > index a784e2b06625..02347e386ea2 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h > > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h > > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ > > > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > > > #ifndef KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS > > #define KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS KVM_MAX_VCPUS > > @@ -585,6 +586,9 @@ struct kvm_memory_slot { > > u32 flags; > > short id; > > u16 as_id; > > + struct file *restricted_file; > > + loff_t restricted_offset; > > + struct restrictedmem_notifier notifier; > > }; > > > > static inline bool kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot) > > @@ -1123,9 +1127,9 @@ enum kvm_mr_change { > > }; > > > > int kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, > > - const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem); > > + const struct kvm_user_mem_region *mem); > > int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, > > - const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem); > > + const struct kvm_user_mem_region *mem); > > void kvm_arch_free_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot); > > void kvm_arch_memslots_updated(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gen); > > int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > > index 5d0941acb5bb..13bff963b8b0 100644 > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > > @@ -103,6 +103,33 @@ struct kvm_userspace_memory_region { > > __u64 userspace_addr; /* start of the userspace allocated memory */ > > }; > > > > +struct kvm_userspace_memory_region_ext { > > + struct kvm_userspace_memory_region region; > > + __u64 restricted_offset; > > + __u32 restricted_fd; > > + __u32 pad1; > > + __u64 pad2[14]; > > +}; > > + > > +#ifdef __KERNEL__ > > +/* > > + * kvm_user_mem_region is a kernel-only alias of kvm_userspace_memory_region_ext > > + * that "unpacks" kvm_userspace_memory_region so that KVM can directly access > > + * all fields from the top-level "extended" region. > > + */ > > +struct kvm_user_mem_region { > > + __u32 slot; > > + __u32 flags; > > + __u64 guest_phys_addr; > > + __u64 memory_size; > > + __u64 userspace_addr; > > + __u64 restricted_offset; > > + __u32 restricted_fd; > > + __u32 pad1; > > + __u64 pad2[14]; > > +}; > > +#endif > > + > > /* > > * The bit 0 ~ bit 15 of kvm_memory_region::flags are visible for userspace, > > * other bits are reserved for kvm internal use which are defined in > > @@ -110,6 +137,7 @@ struct kvm_userspace_memory_region { > > */ > > #define KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES (1UL << 0) > > #define KVM_MEM_READONLY (1UL << 1) > > +#define KVM_MEM_PRIVATE (1UL << 2) > > > > /* for KVM_IRQ_LINE */ > > struct kvm_irq_level { > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/Kconfig b/virt/kvm/Kconfig > > index effdea5dd4f0..d605545d6dd1 100644 > > --- a/virt/kvm/Kconfig > > +++ b/virt/kvm/Kconfig > > @@ -89,3 +89,6 @@ config KVM_XFER_TO_GUEST_WORK > > > > config HAVE_KVM_PM_NOTIFIER > > bool > > + > > +config HAVE_KVM_RESTRICTED_MEM > > + bool > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > > index 7f0f5e9f2406..b882eb2c76a2 100644 > > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > > @@ -1532,7 +1532,7 @@ static void kvm_replace_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, > > } > > } > > > > -static int check_memory_region_flags(const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem) > > +static int check_memory_region_flags(const struct kvm_user_mem_region *mem) > > { > > u32 valid_flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES; > > > > @@ -1934,7 +1934,7 @@ static bool kvm_check_memslot_overlap(struct kvm_memslots *slots, int id, > > * Must be called holding kvm->slots_lock for write. > > */ > > int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, > > - const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem) > > + const struct kvm_user_mem_region *mem) > > { > > struct kvm_memory_slot *old, *new; > > struct kvm_memslots *slots; > > @@ -2038,7 +2038,7 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_set_memory_region); > > > > int kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, > > - const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem) > > + const struct kvm_user_mem_region *mem) > > { > > int r; > > > > @@ -2050,7 +2050,7 @@ int kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_set_memory_region); > > > > static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, > > - struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem) > > + struct kvm_user_mem_region *mem) > > { > > if ((u16)mem->slot >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS) > > return -EINVAL; > > @@ -4698,6 +4698,33 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_stats_fd(struct kvm *kvm) > > return fd; > > } > > > > +#define SANITY_CHECK_MEM_REGION_FIELD(field) \ > > +do { \ > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct kvm_user_mem_region, field) != \ > > + offsetof(struct kvm_userspace_memory_region, field)); \ > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof_field(struct kvm_user_mem_region, field) != \ > > + sizeof_field(struct kvm_userspace_memory_region, field)); \ > > +} while (0) > > + > > +#define SANITY_CHECK_MEM_REGION_EXT_FIELD(field) \ > > +do { \ > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct kvm_user_mem_region, field) != \ > > + offsetof(struct kvm_userspace_memory_region_ext, field)); \ > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof_field(struct kvm_user_mem_region, field) != \ > > + sizeof_field(struct kvm_userspace_memory_region_ext, field)); \ > > +} while (0) > > + > > +static void kvm_sanity_check_user_mem_region_alias(void) > > +{ > > + SANITY_CHECK_MEM_REGION_FIELD(slot); > > + SANITY_CHECK_MEM_REGION_FIELD(flags); > > + SANITY_CHECK_MEM_REGION_FIELD(guest_phys_addr); > > + SANITY_CHECK_MEM_REGION_FIELD(memory_size); > > + SANITY_CHECK_MEM_REGION_FIELD(userspace_addr); > > + SANITY_CHECK_MEM_REGION_EXT_FIELD(restricted_offset); > > + SANITY_CHECK_MEM_REGION_EXT_FIELD(restricted_fd); > > +} > > + > > static long kvm_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, > > unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg) > > { > > @@ -4721,14 +4748,20 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, > > break; > > } > > case KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION: { > > - struct kvm_userspace_memory_region kvm_userspace_mem; > > + struct kvm_user_mem_region mem; > > + unsigned long size = sizeof(struct kvm_userspace_memory_region); > > + > > + kvm_sanity_check_user_mem_region_alias(); > > > > r = -EFAULT; > > - if (copy_from_user(&kvm_userspace_mem, argp, > > - sizeof(kvm_userspace_mem))) > > + if (copy_from_user(&mem, argp, size)) > > + goto out; > > + > > + r = -EINVAL; > > + if (mem.flags & KVM_MEM_PRIVATE) > > goto out; > > > > - r = kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region(kvm, &kvm_userspace_mem); > > + r = kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region(kvm, &mem); > > break; > > } > > case KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG: { > > -- > > 2.25.1 > >