Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:22:55 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To:     Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bfoster@redhat.com,
        kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] workingset: refactor LRU refault to expose
 refault recency check
Message-ID: <Y49eT0JmOt97Caca@casper.infradead.org>
References: <20221205175140.1543229-1-nphamcs@gmail.com>
 <20221205175140.1543229-3-nphamcs@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221205175140.1543229-3-nphamcs@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 09:51:38AM -0800, Nhat Pham wrote:
> +static bool lru_gen_test_recent(void *shadow, bool file, int *memcgid,
> +	struct pglist_data **pgdat, unsigned long *token, bool *workingset)

This line needs more than one tab indent.  I tend to use two tabs,
others try to line up the parameters with the opening '('.  But
one tab is too visually similar to the body of the function.

>  	rcu_read_lock();
> 
>  	memcg = folio_memcg_rcu(folio);
> +
> +	if (!lru_gen_test_recent(shadow, type, &memcg_id, &pgdat, &token,
> +		&workingset))

Similarly here.  &workingset looks like it's part of the body of the if,
not part of the function call.

> +		goto unlock;
> +
>  	if (memcg_id != mem_cgroup_id(memcg))
>  		goto unlock;
>