Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2022 11:21:53 -0500
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, Ives van Hoorne <ives@codesandbox.io>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
        Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/uffd: Always wr-protect pte in pte_mkuffd_wp()
Message-ID: <Y49sIRZ1y6wq884J@x1n>
References: <Y45duzmGGUT0+u8t@x1n>
 <202212060801.yenOQCHL-lkp@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <202212060801.yenOQCHL-lkp@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 08:46:17AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> vim +316 arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> 
>    313	
>    314	static inline pte_t pte_mkuffd_wp(pte_t pte)
>    315	{
>  > 316		return pte_wrprotect(pte_set_flags(pte, _PAGE_UFFD_WP));
>    317	}

It's interesting to know the bot will test any patch I attach in an mail
reply, which is very nice...

I'll send a formal patch for this one soon.

-- 
Peter Xu