Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp517937rwb; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 01:20:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7n8Ubneo0w/oKASMmQsH0Z9luo2TEtLdSMP+YhkVwm5D29EYzMOy8cZH24eKhy9C2QGcRL X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:cad3:b0:189:8b52:cee7 with SMTP id y19-20020a170902cad300b001898b52cee7mr47316262pld.62.1670404800013; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 01:20:00 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1670404800; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GEzZ7DOPljIXCyNbupDy0i3EyRX2j3ajfOxKEGY94dRrrJaNGxVk5o8rfLm8ReDk1u rwgRpicb3VfllpkdSpCDuj1RDjDWuf5zF6IZYxiLomVT9Xd52CFq7dkNjSYFw4KFzcn6 qx4JZaT3svgmsiV6EaJrRyVepb1ZNebGmGpEJh7KH5rKe8rd67asivXMkZoC8dLcpI48 Ah11695AQw/eZ3GD7pONMFgXZsH9fszecdpzvK5a3SsQfHFWkjOuvUBtEoPNLA/BhfAG OEsINko6FzFAcgnSezPP1eUmXgH1SOUaDNKQ+UxAgp8QD9P7RmpdNLUj0028gEdmc6Y9 N5jQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent :content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from :subject:message-id; bh=LI2pGcnWPMI2fIUVMh088vPyCY4PbPsZocQNSxcF+Lg=; b=BUrNLWmCDiEoGZ8kXvXnNZloisW+xdzvxUHgkv3K2S/UFL/ZbgwjzkWxjB+sKFUrVJ JH2hFg2KrE5jaIRkm3QG1g4YrbmTttUUsqHWcXC2V88QD2Mbas4qz63DBGQhlZ5Rred+ ZXRBRRYVMh/OR3vXQLX5FQybN81Lf4KR4LhGHGRw/k8CvqB2ocXqYdP8NyWbP30rofsK FW1IfxvIx2/Ltuze2UnXG3evc1MJacxysX33cLTLXcJyp32LqiFCfn5XCtWlgHuLE9Wq zYyEhiq6AE5ggdGMAOdrkHnHZKaBogAYawD37FArbTrh3Jx5CYuLUFu1cBcqWjUhOYJ/ J+tw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n3-20020a638f03000000b004769f0faab8si19716582pgd.740.2022.12.07.01.19.25; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 01:20:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229727AbiLGJEv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 76 others); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 04:04:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53822 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229554AbiLGJEt (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 04:04:49 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.197]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86F6925EB4; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 01:04:47 -0800 (PST) Received: (Authenticated sender: hadess@hadess.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 534291C0004; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 09:04:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1df12728a2e788788fd387588bac62023e123d16.camel@hadess.net> Subject: Re: [Regression] Logitech BT mouse unusable after commit 532223c8ac57 (still in 6.1-rc8) From: Bastien Nocera To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jiri Kosina Cc: Filipe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?La=EDns?= , Benjamin Tissoires , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Thorsten Leemhuis Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 10:04:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2262737.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher> References: <2262737.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.2 (3.46.2-1.fc37) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2022-12-06 at 15:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Bastien, Jiri, > > Commit 532223c8ac57 ("HID: logitech-hidpp: Enable HID++ for all the > Logitech > Bluetooth devices") caused my Logitech Bluetooth mouse to become > unusable. > > Appended is the change I need to make it work again (note that adding > the > device ID to unhandled_hidpp_devices[] doesn't help, so there must be > some > significant enough difference in how the two cases are handled in the > stack). > > Here's what I get in the log without the patch below: > > [   36.710574] Bluetooth: HIDP (Human Interface Emulation) ver 1.2 > [   36.710592] Bluetooth: HIDP socket layer initialized > [   36.724644] hid-generic 0005:046D:B016.0001: unknown main item tag > 0x0 > [   36.725860] input: Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 Mouse as > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1- > 7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:1/0005:046D:B016.0001/input/input14 > [   36.728036] input: Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 Consumer Control > as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1- > 7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:1/0005:046D:B016.0001/input/input15 > [   36.728823] input: Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 Keyboard as > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1- > 7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:1/0005:046D:B016.0001/input/input18 > [   36.731550] hid-generic 0005:046D:B016.0001: input,hidraw0: > BLUETOOTH HID v12.03 Mouse [Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535] on > 9c:b6:d0:96:8e:c8 > [   36.833039] logitech-hidpp-device 0005:046D:B016.0001: unknown > main item tag 0x0 > [   36.999064] logitech-hidpp-device 0005:046D:B016.0001: Device not > connected > > and here's what I get with it: > > [   43.642546] Bluetooth: HIDP (Human Interface Emulation) ver 1.2 > [   43.642559] Bluetooth: HIDP socket layer initialized > [   43.652898] hid-generic 0005:046D:B016.0001: unknown main item tag > 0x0 > [   43.653833] input: Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 Mouse as > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1- > 7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:1/0005:046D:B016.0001/input/input14 > [   43.655025] input: Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 Consumer Control > as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1- > 7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:1/0005:046D:B016.0001/input/input15 > [   43.655400] input: Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535 Keyboard as > /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1- > 7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:1/0005:046D:B016.0001/input/input18 > [   43.657521] hid-generic 0005:046D:B016.0001: input,hidraw0: > BLUETOOTH HID v12.03 Mouse [Bluetooth Mouse M336/M337/M535] on > 9c:b6:d0:96:8e:c8 > > The only difference seems to be that in the former case the logitech- > hidpp > driver tries to bind to the device, but I guess that is expected.  There really shouldn't be that much difference between the 2 paths, except that hid-logitech-hidpp.c will check that the device supports HID++ in its report descriptors, and then start talking to it to check whether it's connected. Maybe the device doesn't support HID++? Can you try running src/tools/hidpp-list-features from https://github.com/cvuchener/hidpp on the hidraw device for the mouse? > However, > when the device ID is added to unhandled_hidpp_devices[], the > messages look > exactly like in the "good" case, but the mouse still doesn't work. Given that this should be called without ever talking to the device, that tells me that there might be a logic bug in the hid-core that uses ->probe. Benjamin?