Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 7 Dec 2022 09:02:49 +0000
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment_L=E9ger?= <clement.leger@bootlin.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@intel.com>,
        Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
        Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@intel.com>,
        Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Don't dereference fwnode handle
Message-ID: <Y5BWuXjipZcMXlan@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
References: <20221121152704.30180-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <Y35wQuIbiCxyaOyp@smile.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y35wQuIbiCxyaOyp@smile.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Andy,

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:10:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Dunno what happened to my previous reply to this. Okay, trying again...
> 
> + Cc: Petr, Sergey
> 
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 05:27:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Use acpi_fwnode_handle() instead of dereferencing an fwnode handle directly,
> > which is a better coding practice.
> 
> It appears that this series depends on fd070e8ceb90 ("test_printf: Refactor
> fwnode_pointer() to make it more readable") which is in PRINTK tree.
> 
> Sakari, Mauro, if you are okay to route this via that tree, can we get your
> tags for that? Otherwise we need to postpone this till v6.2-rc1 (but I would
> like to decrease the chances to appear a new user of the to be removed API).
> 
> Note, that Greg Acked v1 of the swnode patches (which are the same in v2).

Sorry for the late reply. Feel free to do that if it's not too late, with:

Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>

I don't think the linkelihood for having a new user for this API is high.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus