Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 7 Dec 2022 18:48:03 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 1/5] net/ethtool: add netlink interface for
 the PLCA RS
Message-ID: <Y5DR01UWeWRDaLdS@lunn.ch>
References: <cover.1670371013.git.piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com>
 <350e640b5c3c7b9c25f6fd749dc0237e79e1c573.1670371013.git.piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com>
 <20221206195014.10d7ec82@kernel.org>
 <Y5CQY0pI+4DobFSD@gvm01>
 <Y5CgIL+cu4Fv43vy@lunn.ch>
 <Y5C0V52DjS+1GNhJ@gvm01>
 <Y5C6EomkdTuyjJex@lunn.ch>
 <Y5C8mIQWpWmfmkJ0@gvm01>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y5C8mIQWpWmfmkJ0@gvm01>
Precedence: bulk

> > And only return the actual version value, not the 0x0A.
> About this, at the moment I am reporting the 0x0A to allow in the future
> possible extensions of the standard. A single byte for the version may
> be too limited given this technology is relatively fresh.
> What you think of this?

What does the standards document say about this 0x0A?

     Andrew