Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 7 Dec 2022 15:28:14 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
Cc:     <edumazet@google.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        <bigeasy@linutronix.de>, <imagedong@tencent.com>,
        <kuniyu@amazon.com>, <petrm@nvidia.com>, <liu3101@purdue.edu>,
        <wujianguo@chinatelecom.cn>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tedheadster@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] net: record times of netdev_budget exhausted
Message-ID: <20221207152814.2aa324d8@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <202212071617323068233@zte.com.cn>
References: <CANn89iKqb64sLT2r+2YrpDyMfZ8T6z2Ygtby-ruVNNYvniaV0g@mail.gmail.com>
        <202212071617323068233@zte.com.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 16:17:32 +0800 (CST) yang.yang29@zte.com.cn wrote:
> > We prefer not changing /proc file format as much as we can, they are
> > deprecated/legacy.  
> 
> Should we add some explain of the deprecation in code or doc?
> As it's deprecated, I think it's NAK for this patch.

Correct, it is a NAK.