Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2022 17:23:21 +0100
From:   Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: arm64: selftests: Align VA space allocator with
 TTBR0
Message-ID: <20221208162321.d745p2lsedxdf7v6@kamzik>
References: <20221207214809.489070-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
 <20221207214809.489070-4-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
 <Y5EtP5z6rxSK1VUe@google.com>
 <Y5EvVtAoDSHvIKie@google.com>
 <Y5E5UixcJQ4+tNYg@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y5E5UixcJQ4+tNYg@google.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 01:09:38AM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
...
> Actually, before we do anything, we should get confirmation from the s390 and
> RISC-V folks on whether they have a canonical hole like x86, i.e. maybe x86 is
> the oddball.

riscv splits like x86.

Thanks,
drew