Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date:   Thu, 08 Dec 2022 17:03:59 +0100
From:   netdev@kapio-technology.com
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>, davem@davemloft.net,
        kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: mac-auth/MAB
 implementation
In-Reply-To: <20221208133524.uiqt3vwecrketc5y@skbuf>
References: <20221205185908.217520-1-netdev@kapio-technology.com>
 <20221205185908.217520-4-netdev@kapio-technology.com>
 <Y487T+pUl7QFeL60@shredder>
 <580f6bd5ee7df0c8f0c7623a5b213d8f@kapio-technology.com>
 <20221207202935.eil7swy4osu65qlb@skbuf>
 <1b0d42df6b3f2f17f77cfb45cf8339da@kapio-technology.com>
 <20221208133524.uiqt3vwecrketc5y@skbuf>
User-Agent: Gigahost Webmail
Message-ID: <7c7986329901730416b1505535ec3d36@kapio-technology.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2022-12-08 14:35, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> 
> So it appears that frames which get a VTU miss will still also cause an
> ATU miss, and that's what you're seeing.
> 
> The solution would be to acknowledge this fact, and not print any error
> message from the ATU IRQ handler for unknown FID/VID, which would just
> alarm the user.

Thanks for clearing that up!

At leisure, do you have an idea why it will encounter a VTU miss 
violation at random?

I guess I must check if FID != FID_STANDALONE instead then...