Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221208025816.138712-1-guoren@kernel.org> <20221208025816.138712-7-guoren@kernel.org>
 <87r0xaw6fh.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us>
In-Reply-To: <87r0xaw6fh.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us>
From:   Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:01:52 +0800
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTR+7phq0uaQOH_xtAju-q59BFDy2Nwf4MB=n3ZzV4W6Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next V10 06/10] riscv: entry: Consolidate
 ret_from_kernel_thread into ret_from_fork
To:     =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= <bjorn@kernel.org>
Cc:     arnd@arndb.de, palmer@rivosinc.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        peterz@infradead.org, luto@kernel.org, conor.dooley@microchip.com,
        heiko@sntech.de, jszhang@kernel.org, lazyparser@gmail.com,
        falcon@tinylab.org, chenhuacai@kernel.org, apatel@ventanamicro.com,
        atishp@atishpatra.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
        paul.walmsley@sifive.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        zouyipeng@huawei.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
        David.Laight@aculab.com, chenzhongjin@huawei.com,
        greentime.hu@sifive.com, andy.chiu@sifive.com, ben@decadent.org.uk,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 6:12 PM Bj=C3=B6rn T=C3=B6pel <bjorn@kernel.org> wro=
te:
>
> guoren@kernel.org writes:
>
> > From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> >
> > The ret_from_kernel_thread() behaves similarly with ret_from_fork(),
> > the only difference is whether call the fn(arg) or not, this can be
> > achieved by testing fn is NULL or not, I.E s0 is 0 or not. Many
> > architectures have done the same thing, it make entry.S more clean.
>
> Nit: "it makes".
Okay.

>
>
> Bj=C3=B6rn


--=20
Best Regards
 Guo Ren