Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp2826384rwb; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 06:50:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5yXIxS0pCmV+7pp3QcUgYlfDH5KKxGKoxVtvg1shAbXb+XeQ49RBikrn3M8pXNzLmHTxzC X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1acc:b0:56b:ad3b:7f5b with SMTP id f12-20020a056a001acc00b0056bad3b7f5bmr8000753pfv.1.1670597414369; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 06:50:14 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1670597414; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pcAgu8lUA+ZBMqruc9gri+d8uDJ2rfqo2ppMGXF7dRmO29RSBCDRVY7hIarZ605olh UFAE0+ZieBaIuqpTGfE7Tkc5SshVLgAGnaRXVJYo46A3AVu0lOxOUNSzYit9tSFld/oE Gg3tgjRkfCGfUhWb4/rMt+Cx1rashxDLo59JqSXO9y/ktLTYgK9ucVMWLfHeYqzXoJQG 2BaDrXcybFf+UebcvLUg9CGoX7XD1d6Tdk6xgkP7yRMGgtggyVHDWo2ujPjiYtWHDny2 sqReH5nZSPkHyZmz5lh8urSw4wAu1mqw3iPYRFW8Q+7swk5AeZk5PiBwoTpSaavhKSCE yF/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=+45IU7/Lz8JdF4ZrTXz3oWo7kgKU8stCH6acN/GNca4=; b=bh9NTBHiBxqUu/05yCSYnjc84rULyr2BvKK8ayoWK3uwVua4n8IEwz72ecu0BlCo6n j5xEVD1t/8yRtJ+byJafaOfNVTlVfkUYYl3cIXE46fuvsBRw3vRjV4dja1WkalIsBdD8 qU7EfR7umSJgOQQ+xV7/Hf8B8YC9IYli8yjmszgs7xPC6ioqcc3hwSyozOXyLgtjA5TZ hlWTOnUt+TUl3RhLUQTCeRI21oB/Mfr+L5yI6CY9sYPgXN34N2AcrgGL+D94bPX2VyFF 1/VjBRB8mdPSJPTETmeNR3i5LNT/IKXxw0oOjkeXVuA/a/Vty06jfGjaP7zCgkFPPpWg 098Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ay13-20020a056a00300d00b0056b82fbafebsi1776372pfb.379.2022.12.09.06.50.03; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 06:50:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229928AbiLIOkh (ORCPT + 75 others); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:40:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32896 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229902AbiLIOka (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:40:30 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB96727DFC for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 06:40:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C06C23A; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 06:40:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.41.252]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CA453F73D; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 06:40:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 14:40:25 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, samitolvanen@google.com, keescook@chromium.org, mhiramat@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Allow WITH_ARGS flavour of graph tracer with shadow call stack Message-ID: References: <20221209143402.3332369-1-ardb@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221209143402.3332369-1-ardb@kernel.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 03:34:02PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > The recent switch on arm64 from DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS to > DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS failed to take into account that we currently > require the former in order to allow the function graph tracer to be > enabled in combination with shadow call stacks. This means that this is > no longer permitted at all, in spite of the fact that either flavour of > ftrace works perfectly fine in this combination. > > Given that arm64 is the only arch that implements shadow call stacks in > the first place, let's update the condition to just reflect the arm64 > change. When other architectures adopt shadow call stack support, this > can be revisited if needed. > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel My bad; sorry about this, and thanks for the fix! Acked-by: Mark Rutland We should probably also add: Fixes: 26299b3f6ba26bfc ("ftrace: arm64: move from REGS to ARGS") Mark. > --- > arch/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig > index 072a1b39e3afd0d1..683f365b5e31c856 100644 > --- a/arch/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/Kconfig > @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ config ARCH_SUPPORTS_SHADOW_CALL_STACK > config SHADOW_CALL_STACK > bool "Shadow Call Stack" > depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_SHADOW_CALL_STACK > - depends on DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS || !FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER > + depends on DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS || !FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER > help > This option enables the compiler's Shadow Call Stack, which > uses a shadow stack to protect function return addresses from > -- > 2.35.1 >