Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:07:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:07:19 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:50065 "EHLO bitmover.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:07:03 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:07:02 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Daniel Bergman Cc: Larry McVoy , "Martin J. Bligh" , Henning Schmiedehausen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SMP/cc Cluster description Message-ID: <20011207110702.Q27589@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Bergman , Larry McVoy , "Martin J. Bligh" , Henning Schmiedehausen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011207080603.B6983@work.bitmover.com> <2692295916.1007714643@[10.10.1.2]> <20011207092314.F27589@work.bitmover.com> <3C1111D0.9B7E30FF@home.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <3C1111D0.9B7E30FF@home.se>; from d-b@home.se on Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 08:00:32PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 08:00:32PM +0100, Daniel Bergman wrote: > > My pay job is developing a distributed source management system which works > > by replication. We already have users who put all the etc files in it and > > manage them that way. Works great. It's like rdist except it never screws > > up and it has merging. > > I'm just curious, what about security? Is this done in clear-text? > Sounds dangerous to put /etc/shadow, for example, in clear-text on the > cable. BitKeeper can, and typically does, use ssh as a transport. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/