Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp3118766rwb; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:09:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf603KuzJqkD2ZvgKYThdTVELqKoGWjdI31CclNSu9yrGdhBOcdmvjKqL8pFTfJj3drRKU2b X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:358b:b0:ac:8a8e:164e with SMTP id az11-20020a056a21358b00b000ac8a8e164emr8887621pzc.41.1670609382960; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 10:09:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1670609382; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cBRLOYpqSEZgJcwwShMdlABgW5u3z6vewmvLDXA2mTVxOPIMOonbc16YiIeEH6PPIx q1gJY5owIgGeVfTHfZP0Wmjdz2Uw30XNA94QQw+OYpq02ipfO7vSzrXH60mNALf+fYgz MjGOasHIVJ+iwI7biPH0EqpBR9rFKEcl3gfXYAcImvz2EtKVjoy0nfB0ZnFGXqlKEZKR FLIpIZL3LQIQ+fXU9ITAe9D1EVOAXOM7DYdHlDM/Y96TeP539hx9d3vPAeGUP/nWy70v Z7ZX5k54P9fTFucUBMlSpD1PFkDgmC2y0P92fGNdOdxG6ZA5pCnqIOOm2sbg1HiiDbvR 9muw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=kuQDmXVI6AUKEcYPLNSszxFNnmXrkePaT3VtT+uEHZQ=; b=HUz+fFke0hu31gpIZNFk8+t08y9l9u2q0j8YTZ4DUnDDH4FR0AycftTOds7m9sizgJ d3xrlSqBgkntdpQoK1UQXeeU4u+yV5/RCEH9qKSnni+xoKwcV7RJjk1FQUc2+LwZsJPf X+f+ZXTDL99NTNwu282L8NoGirIvODlRoqSfNuxhqVXQm9DPkLPvBHHFqdWS0dqv5vhN 8jqToT6LObCy/o8hxcKw8jIENBH5TDLrR7KyrtcJQGT/0LWQNNtSNJAxPrvSE2GUOH+V 2cSjTUsx3hYGgiJ/XSqjDckGHITPvpQJQ8OfArkPDSDO6JAAwnLlbSYZRXa1ghKVnoK2 f2fA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=HPuNxYxc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id nv4-20020a17090b1b4400b002192eb3532bsi2822926pjb.116.2022.12.09.10.09.33; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 10:09:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=HPuNxYxc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229488AbiLIR3g (ORCPT + 74 others); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 12:29:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48710 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230033AbiLIR3Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2022 12:29:25 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01E376D7EB for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:29:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id e7-20020a17090a77c700b00216928a3917so8824429pjs.4 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 09:29:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=kuQDmXVI6AUKEcYPLNSszxFNnmXrkePaT3VtT+uEHZQ=; b=HPuNxYxcswp+YZr0FxtYoZgorvZcNvfgr727KgTVN1kVR9gXJWL1CqmBOHDPd3BTDh B1yXnSnkRJ9kmcK4hREN2GsL8ggUBH+lVsdc2CP69wO/ikZz2giVPPzXeiVtSKDpCBF0 kU8XEdMy5PmpOohYjejRZcSmOn8N2Ct4eUxpe2fLcSCAEBIr5MIZgcSFGrRb4LTrRL/q VJ4kNZLFuf+XWYW66bwQnWz4pfPhsOeTRCkznkS4kpLJ2qQgi6KOIzuPzTwHGOP7bY4q 6qhowfZmihUE/v+o/fDbj6lk8fCNaNkY/y84Cyd+pj57OEoR5d9Q2NChYxJJQD/DB/tm ySyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kuQDmXVI6AUKEcYPLNSszxFNnmXrkePaT3VtT+uEHZQ=; b=6N6WsS26Eg84yL+8gm2sdixi/+vd21fve2JWixZ4tubENqGgaj0APzk9YFv5fAe6W7 ut1H/445FCixpN7r//YtH9VAOPaNl/1qpYAgnk9SNheyrvIxdgVI3AHbvfbKJods22HI 79OzygSc/n87IR+HRX22jWjmM4kyO9HR1htHVmLAJRKNCkosKpZQ8SrhjnsHfcQ9wjm7 7+WaiDuW1x/KDCXvcxqDYOYGKJgCIKaFIg9lzr/KC5MkiRzP/0J7HYooWxT+5GW+8IGe jMXhVzaek+TI5eWeLa+fIpwWjq/iTWceAVPt8sBbgr6e6c1Dvu2XRpC/09cf5T4PIg36 MabA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmacTQ9KjekweaWv8lQOw8/V7WDEbCMNVZmS0mo9vDnvpQHp41Z Fha7cC7sE7Kwis/Y+EVzb7hAKpbPZxQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c40f:b0:189:ea22:6d6a with SMTP id k15-20020a170902c40f00b00189ea226d6amr10405154plk.60.1670606964310; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 09:29:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (fwdproxy-prn-003.fbsv.net. [2a03:2880:ff:3::face:b00c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d8-20020a170902cec800b00189a50d2a38sm1613909plg.38.2022.12.09.09.29.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 09 Dec 2022 09:29:23 -0800 (PST) From: Nhat Pham To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bfoster@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] workingset: refactor LRU refault to expose refault recency check Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:29:22 -0800 Message-Id: <20221209172922.3143160-1-nphamcs@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <202212091724.8wijxY41-lkp@intel.com> References: <202212091724.8wijxY41-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In preparation for computing recently evicted pages in cachestat, refactor workingset_refault and lru_gen_refault to expose a helper function that would test if an evicted page is recently evicted. Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham --- include/linux/swap.h | 1 + mm/workingset.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) Fix the issue reported by kernel test robot diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h index a18cf4b7c724..dae6f6f955eb 100644 --- a/include/linux/swap.h +++ b/include/linux/swap.h @@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ static inline void folio_set_swap_entry(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry) } /* linux/mm/workingset.c */ +bool workingset_test_recent(void *shadow, bool file, bool *workingset); void workingset_age_nonresident(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long nr_pages); void *workingset_eviction(struct folio *folio, struct mem_cgroup *target_memcg); void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow); diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c index 79585d55c45d..006482c4e0bd 100644 --- a/mm/workingset.c +++ b/mm/workingset.c @@ -244,6 +244,33 @@ static void *lru_gen_eviction(struct folio *folio) return pack_shadow(mem_cgroup_id(memcg), pgdat, token, refs); } +/* + * Test if the folio is recently evicted. + * + * As a side effect, also populates the references with + * values unpacked from the shadow of the evicted folio. + */ +static bool lru_gen_test_recent(void *shadow, bool file, bool *workingset) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *eviction_memcg; + struct lruvec *lruvec; + struct lru_gen_struct *lrugen; + unsigned long min_seq; + + int memcgid; + struct pglist_data *pgdat; + unsigned long token; + + unpack_shadow(shadow, &memcgid, &pgdat, &token, workingset); + eviction_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_id(memcgid); + + lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(eviction_memcg, pgdat); + lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen; + + min_seq = READ_ONCE(lrugen->min_seq[file]); + return !((token >> LRU_REFS_WIDTH) != (min_seq & (EVICTION_MASK >> LRU_REFS_WIDTH))); +} + static void lru_gen_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow) { int hist, tier, refs; @@ -306,6 +333,11 @@ static void *lru_gen_eviction(struct folio *folio) return NULL; } +static bool lru_gen_test_recent(void *shadow, bool file, bool *workingset) +{ + return true; +} + static void lru_gen_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow) { } @@ -373,40 +405,31 @@ void *workingset_eviction(struct folio *folio, struct mem_cgroup *target_memcg) folio_test_workingset(folio)); } -/** - * workingset_refault - Evaluate the refault of a previously evicted folio. - * @folio: The freshly allocated replacement folio. - * @shadow: Shadow entry of the evicted folio. +/* + * Test if the folio is recently evicted by checking if + * refault distance of shadow exceeds workingset size. * - * Calculates and evaluates the refault distance of the previously - * evicted folio in the context of the node and the memcg whose memory - * pressure caused the eviction. + * As a side effect, populate workingset with the value + * unpacked from shadow. */ -void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow) +bool workingset_test_recent(void *shadow, bool file, bool *workingset) { - bool file = folio_is_file_lru(folio); struct mem_cgroup *eviction_memcg; struct lruvec *eviction_lruvec; unsigned long refault_distance; unsigned long workingset_size; - struct pglist_data *pgdat; - struct mem_cgroup *memcg; - unsigned long eviction; - struct lruvec *lruvec; unsigned long refault; - bool workingset; + int memcgid; - long nr; + struct pglist_data *pgdat; + unsigned long eviction; - if (lru_gen_enabled()) { - lru_gen_refault(folio, shadow); - return; - } + if (lru_gen_enabled()) + return lru_gen_test_recent(shadow, file, workingset); - unpack_shadow(shadow, &memcgid, &pgdat, &eviction, &workingset); + unpack_shadow(shadow, &memcgid, &pgdat, &eviction, workingset); eviction <<= bucket_order; - rcu_read_lock(); /* * Look up the memcg associated with the stored ID. It might * have been deleted since the folio's eviction. @@ -425,7 +448,8 @@ void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow) */ eviction_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_id(memcgid); if (!mem_cgroup_disabled() && !eviction_memcg) - goto out; + return false; + eviction_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(eviction_memcg, pgdat); refault = atomic_long_read(&eviction_lruvec->nonresident_age); @@ -447,21 +471,6 @@ void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow) */ refault_distance = (refault - eviction) & EVICTION_MASK; - /* - * The activation decision for this folio is made at the level - * where the eviction occurred, as that is where the LRU order - * during folio reclaim is being determined. - * - * However, the cgroup that will own the folio is the one that - * is actually experiencing the refault event. - */ - nr = folio_nr_pages(folio); - memcg = folio_memcg(folio); - pgdat = folio_pgdat(folio); - lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat); - - mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, WORKINGSET_REFAULT_BASE + file, nr); - mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed(); /* * Compare the distance to the existing workingset size. We @@ -483,8 +492,51 @@ void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow) NR_INACTIVE_ANON); } } - if (refault_distance > workingset_size) + + return refault_distance <= workingset_size; +} + +/** + * workingset_refault - Evaluate the refault of a previously evicted folio. + * @folio: The freshly allocated replacement folio. + * @shadow: Shadow entry of the evicted folio. + * + * Calculates and evaluates the refault distance of the previously + * evicted folio in the context of the node and the memcg whose memory + * pressure caused the eviction. + */ +void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow) +{ + bool file = folio_is_file_lru(folio); + struct pglist_data *pgdat; + struct mem_cgroup *memcg; + struct lruvec *lruvec; + bool workingset; + long nr; + + if (lru_gen_enabled()) { + lru_gen_refault(folio, shadow); + return; + } + + rcu_read_lock(); + + nr = folio_nr_pages(folio); + memcg = folio_memcg(folio); + pgdat = folio_pgdat(folio); + lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat); + + if (!workingset_test_recent(shadow, file, &workingset)) { + /* + * The activation decision for this folio is made at the level + * where the eviction occurred, as that is where the LRU order + * during folio reclaim is being determined. + * + * However, the cgroup that will own the folio is the one that + * is actually experiencing the refault event. + */ goto out; + } folio_set_active(folio); workingset_age_nonresident(lruvec, nr); @@ -498,6 +550,7 @@ void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow) mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, WORKINGSET_RESTORE_BASE + file, nr); } out: + mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, WORKINGSET_REFAULT_BASE + file, nr); rcu_read_unlock(); } -- 2.30.2