Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:07:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:06:54 -0500 Received: from e21.nc.us.ibm.com ([32.97.136.227]:2775 "EHLO e21.nc.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:06:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 11:06:01 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Larry McVoy cc: Henning Schmiedehausen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SMP/cc Cluster description Message-ID: <2700813795.1007723161@mbligh.des.sequent.com> In-Reply-To: <20011207104830.N27589@work.bitmover.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > You're right, it's so much better to manage all machines independently > so that they can get out of sync with each other. No it's much better to just have one machine running one instance of the OS so that it can't get out of sync with itself. >> Keeping things simple that users and/or sysadmins have to deal with is a >> Good Thing (tm). I'd have the complexity in the kernel, where complexity >> is pushed to the kernel developers, thanks. > > Yeah, that's what I want, my password file management in the kernel. > Brilliant. Why didn't I think of that? No, I want my password file management to be in a one file for the whole machine. Where it is now. Without requiring syncronisation. If we put the complexity in the kernel to make the system scale running one OS we don't have the problem that you're creating at all. >> No it's not that far off topic, my point is that you're shifting the complexity >> problems to other areas (eg. system mangement / the application level / >> filesystems / scheduler load balancing) rather than solving them. > > Whoops, you are so right, in order to work on OS scaling I'd better solve > password file management or the OS ideas are meaningless. Uh huh. I'll > get right on that, thanks for setting me straight here. If you don't chop the OS up into multiple instances, you don't have these problems. If you create the problems, I expect you to solve them. You're not making the system as a whole scale, you're just pushing the problems out somewhere else. Martin. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/