Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp4636354rwb; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 12:07:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5xErtOZJzoufOFnRPwEzaJn7ofh6GtXUp4N+r3Ie3BkIOJ1qpkqQIGlvOSujMKbY84FgOr X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:6f02:b0:aa:3283:ab9e with SMTP id gt2-20020a056a206f0200b000aa3283ab9emr11601773pzb.24.1670702862521; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 12:07:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1670702862; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IuSMk1C5O6LDWzg9nVTqmbCqM/X3ILe7EALm1zbuiWIpmpfXe3rLN4MC3AsXhRgg9l gpRSUwpEH+S4mXlF1eyzQVOBSC+53Qqg76ze6N+xQerpIIU93bIHkQLOZfDhWvYMETkO 4uH3OfyC87Oodbglx+2m/AfBZsGjCDutU2KcZ4KyhQPcRuIQMOOxjXXVeMYteT1Pq35k GhV0baKRVwDeIESFUwFvpOaMaLAE1tH/uf4BQwxbHzhx6Q3QyxymgWbiS4smM5GDryX6 7hIUGtyJQlOOw44+RFANWteHmhbscah7BGG6SVpZiTRz9cmDTXxS6a8/XsSR7obOX/ZH oaEg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=Fl5MctCQk0LC4pWHcXHbWejyc3vm1182BaiSiZMxkg8=; b=OICLGYdDSLxYG8Fhqctp4g3+MesRO7Kkgd6y+Mx++S01th1AuiFMyPB7y4DVNsU/pS +aUv289sl1CMRPZ6/iXjYQ+WbUmXrCUmHnW3vXw0IBzzVy8MsV+O6UlpNxMF4IHPSA8j R4t3vezM8laXQs7pkSSUQeDN/KZqO6Md2iuj65KR2yUUW0qhNtfL1fk6lGzPgA467N0s QVJ5S2DLKjPYt7ynyb1SpfQylPZEwa8j/dgHMrwd26jGEcCzsPR9N4zYPfGQEOYnZwoW ZOmOpug8rJNWkiEE4Sf7GWHumi5x3CJy1HZ7lull+5c+7zCGRjorGVk5ZeeMF6prEQBI uCtA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.org.uk header.s=zeniv-20220401 header.b=mSx4iEOB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y23-20020a63e257000000b0045f7fc4b812si5021575pgj.295.2022.12.10.12.07.33; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 12:07:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.org.uk header.s=zeniv-20220401 header.b=mSx4iEOB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229891AbiLJTNF (ORCPT + 75 others); Sat, 10 Dec 2022 14:13:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33080 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229560AbiLJTND (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Dec 2022 14:13:03 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2a03:a000:7:0:5054:ff:fe1c:15ff]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90E8D1580F for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 11:13:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Fl5MctCQk0LC4pWHcXHbWejyc3vm1182BaiSiZMxkg8=; b=mSx4iEOB8tyHhBRmNprwoholj1 s+Vnhc0Th/XERxTkM+iHdIooS6Lpru4Bb97XyZGetaevmlOntTflD1ulUXVUMHivhrIDggjskpznL TqPy21t86S2lMua6jy5YVEV5XL3aTz3gT1/btJZywFWD0qMtKlghA6uWG1mlqsjCpG/mnVLdrG4FP qAqh2RNEHXj87njDimLIAK3eyiwPN0GzJSNPeEoE3Sgz6T3SNtnlmOi9uklm8mo1yPhkvDC8BLb4U CCg3o4cgrCgHrT5du5wMIysMOWQQ1DLenSy/x5nTyo6MsMMfKidCCIN4VobaaFyUSnUylhN6qOBxE YIOmWZMg==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p45HO-00Araa-1F; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 19:12:58 +0000 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 19:12:58 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Chen Zhongjin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: sysv: Fix sysv_nblocks() returns wrong value Message-ID: References: <20221209100448.176857-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221209100448.176857-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com> Sender: Al Viro X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 06:04:48PM +0800, Chen Zhongjin wrote: > sysv_nblocks() returns 'blocks' rather than 'res', which only counting > the number of triple-indirect blocks and causing sysv_getattr() gets a > wrong result. > > Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhongjin > --- > fs/sysv/itree.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/sysv/itree.c b/fs/sysv/itree.c > index d4ec9bb97de9..3b8567564e7e 100644 > --- a/fs/sysv/itree.c > +++ b/fs/sysv/itree.c > @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ static unsigned sysv_nblocks(struct super_block *s, loff_t size) > res += blocks; > direct = 1; > } > - return blocks; > + return res; > } > > int sysv_getattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, const struct path *path, Argh... To quote historical tree: commit 0fcd426de9d02175c9771ea19f972389eeba7688 Author: Andries E. Brouwer Date: Sun Aug 22 00:07:46 2004 -0700 [PATCH] minix block usage counting fix In 2.5.18 some minix-specific stuff was moved to the minix subdirectory where it belonged. However, a typo crept in, causing inode disk usage to be incorrectly reported. A few people have complained, but so far not sufficiently loudly. Signed-off-by: Andries Brouwer Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds diff --git a/fs/minix/itree_common.c b/fs/minix/itree_common.c index f8e9bd831c90..5a4b51dbfcb3 100644 --- a/fs/minix/itree_common.c +++ b/fs/minix/itree_common.c @@ -358,5 +358,5 @@ static inline unsigned nblocks(loff_t size) res += blocks; direct = 1; } - return blocks; + return res; } This is obviously the sysvfs counterpart, not noticed back then and not caught in 18 years since then... Mea culpa - the original bug (both in minixfs and sysvfs) is mine and I should've thought to look for sysvfs counterpart when minixfs fix got posted. Applied.