Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:19:03 +0100
From:   Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org,
        agross@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Add DISPCC node
Message-ID: <20221212101903.bmwgdxpyyifm5xrr@SoMainline.org>
References: <20221212093315.11390-1-konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
 <20221212093315.11390-2-konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221212093315.11390-2-konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk

On 2022-12-12 10:33:13, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Years after the SoC support has been added, it's high time for it to
> get dispcc going. Add the node to ensure that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

On Sony Xperia 5:
Tested-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
> index a0c57fb798d3..ff04397777f4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
> @@ -3579,6 +3579,32 @@ camnoc_virt: interconnect@ac00000 {
>  			qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
>  		};
>  
> +		dispcc: clock-controller@af00000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,sm8150-dispcc";
> +			reg = <0 0x0af00000 0 0x10000>;
> +			clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
> +				 <0>,
> +				 <0>,
> +				 <0>,
> +				 <0>,
> +				 <0>,
> +				 <0>;
> +			clock-names = "bi_tcxo",
> +				      "dsi0_phy_pll_out_byteclk",
> +				      "dsi0_phy_pll_out_dsiclk",
> +				      "dsi1_phy_pll_out_byteclk",
> +				      "dsi1_phy_pll_out_dsiclk",
> +				      "dp_phy_pll_link_clk",
> +				      "dp_phy_pll_vco_div_clk";
> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> +			#power-domain-cells = <1>;
> +
> +			power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8150_MMCX>;
> +			/* TODO: Maybe rpmhpd_opp_min_svs could work as well? */

Is this still something we want to check/test?  Do we need a reference
manual to be sure?

> +			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> +		};
> +
>  		pdc: interrupt-controller@b220000 {
>  			compatible = "qcom,sm8150-pdc", "qcom,pdc";
>  			reg = <0 0x0b220000 0 0x400>;
> -- 
> 2.38.1
>