Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 19:41:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 19:41:11 -0500 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:49420 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 19:41:02 -0500 Message-ID: <3A171A92.18FF3C3E@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 19:10:58 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tobias Ringstrom CC: Frank Davis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [CFT] dmfe.c network driver update for 2.4 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tobias Ringstrom wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Frank Davis wrote: > > > > I would rather fix those non-SMP compliant drivers to be SMP compliant, > > then keeping them 'broken'. Adding the print statements would only be a > > temporary solution. > > Of course. This list of priorites is very natural, I think: > > 1. Working SMP driver > 2. Broken SMP driver with a warning. > 3. Broken SMP driver without a warning. (Even if "everyone" knows it > is broken) > > It takes less than a minute to add such a warning, but it can take days > or weeks to find someone to really fix the driver. That was my point. Marking them with a #warning is fine with me. -- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense MandrakeSoft | -- Picasso - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/