Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 12 Dec 2022 10:47:05 -0800
From:   Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc:     "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        "Tim C . Chen" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/22] sched/core: Add user_tick as argument to
 scheduler_tick()
Message-ID: <20221212184705.GE27353@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com>
References: <20221128132100.30253-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
 <20221128132100.30253-5-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
 <40ff1e4c-b128-c0d0-a024-e454e843ee46@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40ff1e4c-b128-c0d0-a024-e454e843ee46@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 01:21:47PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 28/11/2022 14:20, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Differentiate between user and kernel ticks so that the scheduler updates
> > the IPC class of the current task during the latter.
> 
> Just to make sure ,,, 05/22 introduces `rq->curr` IPCC update during
> user_tick, i.e. the former?

Yes. Thank you for the catch!