Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 03:36:23 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        syzbot <syzbot+919c5a9be8433b8bf201@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in do_mkdirat
Message-ID: <Y5fzN9ZWgXFyT+fU@ZenIV>
References: <20221211002908.2210-1-hdanton@sina.com>
 <00000000000025ff8d05ef842be6@google.com>
 <20221211075612.2486-1-hdanton@sina.com>
 <20221211102208.2600-1-hdanton@sina.com>
 <20221212032911.2965-1-hdanton@sina.com>
 <20221213014716.3347-1-hdanton@sina.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221213014716.3347-1-hdanton@sina.com>
Sender: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 09:47:16AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:

> > maintainer time is expensive.  So by not improving syzbot in a way
> > that really shouldn't be all that difficult, the syzbot maintainers is
> > disrespectiving the time of the upstream maintainers.
> 
> Are upstream maintainers prefering to spend weeks and months creating
> ext4 beatles for example over taking a couple of hours scanning the
> syzbot reports like this one? Why does the bot kick you if you have a
> clean butt? Why are usb people irrelevant in this case?

And to continue with the rethorical questions: has anyone bothered to
inform you that you are an obnoxious cunt?

*plonk*