Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <3729df62-8d39-db47-0b57-2bef37cc5830@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:42:56 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.5.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] arm/arm64: dts: mediatek: Fix existing NAND
 controller node name
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Xiangsheng Hou <xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, benliang.zhao@mediatek.com,
        bin.zhang@mediatek.com
References: <20221209064317.2828-1-xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com>
 <20221209064317.2828-9-xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com>
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221209064317.2828-9-xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Il 09/12/22 07:43, Xiangsheng Hou ha scritto:
> Change the existing node name in order to match NAND controller DT
> bindings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiangsheng Hou <xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi             | 2 +-
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi | 2 +-
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7622.dtsi  | 2 +-
>   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Splitting this in two commits, one for ARM and one for ARM64 would probably
be better, but since I don't have strong opinions on that...

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>