Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 15:44:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 15:44:14 -0500 Received: from 24-28-205-10.mf3.cox.rr.com ([24.28.205.10]:24070 "EHLO 24-28-205-10.mf3.cox.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 15:44:02 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: 24-28-205-10.mf3.cox.rr.com!not-for-mail From: gsh@cox.rr.com (Greg Hennessy) Newsgroups: list.linux Subject: Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 20:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A InterNetNews site Lines: 14 Message-ID: <9ur9ml$5jp$1@24-28-205-10.mf3.cox.rr.com> In-Reply-To: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost X-Trace: 24-28-205-10.mf3.cox.rr.com 1007757845 5754 127.0.0.1 (7 Dec 2001 20:44:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@24-28-205-10.mf3.cox.rr.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 20:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article , Linus Torvalds wrote: > bonnie is a _benchmark_. It's meant for finding bad performance. Changing > it to make it work better when performance is bad is _pointless_. You've > now made the whole point of bonnie go away. It isn't just bonnie showing bad performance. My application shows it, bonnie shows it, and tiobench shows it. I think the focus on putc may be too intense. It isn't suprizing to me that either the kernel or glibc may not be optimised on ia64, I'm just trying to figure out how to get better io rates out of my itanium machine. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/