Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:06:10 +0000
From:   "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
        jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net,
        rwarsow@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/106] 5.10.159-rc1 review
Message-ID: <Y5hqsggURI1Me1ik@debian>
References: <20221212130924.863767275@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221212130924.863767275@linuxfoundation.org>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 02:09:03PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.159 release.
> There are 106 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:08:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]

arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model).
Regression noticed:
Failed to start Network Manager

Will try a bisect and find which commit caused it.


[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2339


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip