Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <0bcf7776-59d7-53ef-bfd0-449940a05161@kernel.dk>
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:43:09 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.5.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 0/8] block, bfq: extend bfq to support multi-actuator
 drives
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Arie van der Hoeven <arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com>,
        Rory Chen <rory.c.chen@seagate.com>,
        Glen Valante <glen.valante@linaro.org>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
References: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
 <A0328388-7C6B-46A4-A05E-DCD6D91334AE@linaro.org>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In-Reply-To: <A0328388-7C6B-46A4-A05E-DCD6D91334AE@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 12/13/22 8:40?AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> Hi Jens, Damien,
> can we consider this for 6.2?

No, it's too late to queue up for 6.2, even when it was posted on
Friday. Bigger changes like that should be in my tree at least a week
before the merge window opens, preferably two (or somewhere in between).

I already tagged the main 6.2 block changes on Friday, and the pull
request has been sent out.

-- 
Jens Axboe