Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   xiubli@redhat.com
To:     jlayton@kernel.org, idryomov@gmail.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     mchangir@redhat.com, lhenriques@suse.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] ceph: add ceph specific member support for file_lock
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:35:12 +0800
Message-Id: <20221214033512.659913-3-xiubli@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221214033512.659913-1-xiubli@redhat.com>
References: <20221214033512.659913-1-xiubli@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>

When ceph releasing the file_lock it will try to get the inode pointer
from the fl->fl_file, which the memory could already be released by
another thread in filp_close(). Because in VFS layer the fl->fl_file
doesn't increase the file's reference counter.

Will switch to use ceph dedicate lock info to track the inode.

And in ceph_fl_release_lock() we should skip all the operations if
the fl->fl_u.ceph_fl.fl_inode is not set, which should come from
the request file_lock. And we will set fl->fl_u.ceph_fl.fl_inode when
inserting it to the inode lock list, which is when copying the lock.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57986
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
---
 fs/ceph/locks.c    | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/fs.h |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ceph/locks.c b/fs/ceph/locks.c
index b191426bf880..d31955f710f2 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/locks.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/locks.c
@@ -34,18 +34,34 @@ static void ceph_fl_copy_lock(struct file_lock *dst, struct file_lock *src)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = file_inode(dst->fl_file);
 	atomic_inc(&ceph_inode(inode)->i_filelock_ref);
+	dst->fl_u.ceph.inode = igrab(inode);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Do not use the 'fl->fl_file' in release function, which
+ * is possibly already released by another thread.
+ */
 static void ceph_fl_release_lock(struct file_lock *fl)
 {
-	struct inode *inode = file_inode(fl->fl_file);
-	struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
+	struct inode *inode = fl->fl_u.ceph.inode;
+	struct ceph_inode_info *ci;
+
+	/*
+	 * If inode is NULL it should be a request file_lock,
+	 * nothing we can do.
+	 */
+	if (!inode)
+		return;
+
+	ci = ceph_inode(inode);
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ci->i_filelock_ref)) {
 		/* clear error when all locks are released */
 		spin_lock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
 		ci->i_ceph_flags &= ~CEPH_I_ERROR_FILELOCK;
 		spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
 	}
+	fl->fl_u.ceph.inode = NULL;
+	iput(inode);
 }
 
 static const struct file_lock_operations ceph_fl_lock_ops = {
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 7b52fdfb6da0..c92c62f1e964 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1119,6 +1119,9 @@ struct file_lock {
 			int state;		/* state of grant or error if -ve */
 			unsigned int	debug_id;
 		} afs;
+		struct {
+			struct inode *inode;
+		} ceph;
 	} fl_u;
 } __randomize_layout;
 
-- 
2.31.1