Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:39:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:38:20 -0500 Received: from deimos.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.190]:7165 "EHLO deimos.hpl.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:38:10 -0500 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15377.13976.342104.636304@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:37:28 -0800 To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Andrew Morton , j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Mosberger Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <3C103A1E.2524A7B7@zip.com.au> X-Mailer: VM 6.76 under Emacs 20.4.1 Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:52:07 -0200 (BRST), Marcelo Tosatti said: Marcelo> I'm really not willing to apply this kludge... Do you agree that it should always be safe to call printk() from C code? --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/