Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:37:37 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix panic in jbd by adding locks
Message-ID: <20070815113737.GC7642@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
References: <20070814152255.GB24127@dhcp-243-37.rdu.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070814152255.GB24127@dhcp-243-37.rdu.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1033
Lines: 24

  Hello,

> It is possible to panic the box by a race condition that exists in the
> journalling code where we do not take the j_revoke_lock when traversing the
> journal's revoked record list.  This patch has been tested and we haven't seen
> the issue yet, its a rather straightforward and correct (at least I think so :)
> fix.  Thank you,
  In principle, the patch looks fine. The only thing I'm wondering about
is how that panic can happen... Journal write_revoke_records() is called
from journal_commit_transaction() when revoke table for the committing
transaction shouldn't see any further changes. So maybe the patch is
masking a different problem.
  Do you have a way of reproducing the problem? Any stack trace
available?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/