Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp222470rwb; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:26:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4VSznLXvWbL+LEyGPujcXheIkXtekFRBa50P9h8w5Ug7yn4uugkfs/OLnOAa+3nzKeHooU X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f64d:b0:189:603d:ea71 with SMTP id m13-20020a170902f64d00b00189603dea71mr26995504plg.58.1671063991796; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:26:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1671063991; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nrxIHZiK+8qUw+KXayqba28hmijZOo6vnp7pz71prXPv5SDS0K3WxynBFIHPyZlDI1 4/86Q2Laeg2yOlZjAHCy6gkzyuM5dVicLkYEAD1WSbIaOpeKGoyLUutEWTBPYn60SnSx bHQhVLLIL5NrkeGnSvMADz0I1isLbu2urwdkvPKTMvtjTqHqDStZ8HMNKwvCm0NJxsMA 9DTpbTUXnAOua15Mgb2YT5rs4weIHdIkjj914XkRNU2Vq3B70eth/cnAk29M3nLoTCkF 3Ub66bFloq4xGhBKdxjzzxs9yc6+H/Wy1d2fiFZ+69kqih3sKdOmwQyvnT5fvBW8JwCr Yg9Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=5JdRkrY4AHyx5V8nEAerxJVsYW5SOsjwL/9h06jnfpo=; b=KchVkOtUN3sff8av/04zI8ik5eZwtmu5K0DAokzjuHgntpYuPD8tKmQLGkWRSECsDs H/fI6gCDe0O5MzJh43u3DPS8Ao+JhapxlNCsJzB95stzp7zBGkCbkmT2y4N5dmNx4DqN P3tGMLKveNxLBVmzUA5uVPa2AI9b18Ij1WapCFnkEe8ZDqui+GPypPg2JpyTttdUwH6r 6Eb8rucj4MNDpV/bqP4Ia1WNSekFhW+riYAMGnAQNIiKNwNx6EYUV2vAYSLOEaTCXqqb i/rycAoSuyKwUvQVvhxoxDL9LydyWUv1gPqJC/UnoYqdV34WednqrxQyEAWKadshAxJA eqHQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=CgO9jXmX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l11-20020a654c4b000000b004791266226asi1346153pgr.66.2022.12.14.16.26.22; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:26:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=CgO9jXmX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230176AbiLOAOV (ORCPT + 70 others); Wed, 14 Dec 2022 19:14:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33856 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229540AbiLOANl (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2022 19:13:41 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F9C532D8 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:12:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id 3-20020a17090a098300b00219041dcbe9so990446pjo.3 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:12:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5JdRkrY4AHyx5V8nEAerxJVsYW5SOsjwL/9h06jnfpo=; b=CgO9jXmXzNorxxCMtt58UeRi5g6/jidHsD3ynHjxaWxA8VdHsZJSxDrf+YAy5/+4rQ F0DOwu5R5L6IOCPs5dHRKeQXGZk6Kh4bxTWV9oyybTWUcY19oJZv1nYIn8SB8/kMT96W +UtNwSduBVXSD/fBZm3EIsNZoK1klg+cu/Qn0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=5JdRkrY4AHyx5V8nEAerxJVsYW5SOsjwL/9h06jnfpo=; b=uMYKl6ndm6VC1TgeoT7gzcd9Q9rTEzAI6nf/IK+7Jr240/x7U4HlQNzMQyOxSoZhPb n3RJxOqcv42jbKH0FQO1whmWCH+iooqTTkJhBaGEI+WeqSMy75BmwyZtKySZNdeZtdsI o+acftmP0ZUyL71MPR06kacMdJj5b7Cy39GnVosZfskDBvFgIyKgu3OtXjH4KtBSEo5m inVTFg42wU5pEWzRqHMvGyx9Cfo7/WkYJubXzM73TzeK63kegCKVMa+DK1GPdiQWlP9n z4VuPCJsCOpPNsxEVpUIyQjYq7r2yEAKMgHZEi2sH8TPhjUV4UEeCXU9zQkQkqgQD9Ym XKhA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmECmvE9IwDIyofXFImJRWUTBjdwV+GZW+XQz2TeAXZsExQOGUo 205fo5RgttkNJqzwS2CvdMAjvA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ee8a:b0:219:b034:9415 with SMTP id i10-20020a17090aee8a00b00219b0349415mr27482016pjz.12.1671063133657; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:12:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from jeffxud.c.googlers.com.com (30.202.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.202.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 3-20020a17090a08c300b0021937b2118bsm1845738pjn.54.2022.12.14.16.12.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:12:13 -0800 (PST) From: jeffxu@chromium.org To: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, keescook@chromium.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, dverkamp@chromium.org, hughd@google.com, jeffxu@google.com, jorgelo@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jannh@google.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v8 0/5] mm/memfd: introduce MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 00:12:00 +0000 Message-Id: <20221215001205.51969-1-jeffxu@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0.rc1.256.g54fd8350bd-goog MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jeff Xu Since Linux introduced the memfd feature, memfd have always had their execute bit set, and the memfd_create() syscall doesn't allow setting it differently. However, in a secure by default system, such as ChromeOS, (where all executables should come from the rootfs, which is protected by Verified boot), this executable nature of memfd opens a door for NoExec bypass and enables “confused deputy attack”. E.g, in VRP bug [1]: cros_vm process created a memfd to share the content with an external process, however the memfd is overwritten and used for executing arbitrary code and root escalation. [2] lists more VRP in this kind. On the other hand, executable memfd has its legit use, runc uses memfd’s seal and executable feature to copy the contents of the binary then execute them, for such system, we need a solution to differentiate runc's use of executable memfds and an attacker's [3]. To address those above, this set of patches add following: 1> Let memfd_create() set X bit at creation time. 2> Let memfd to be sealed for modifying X bit. 3> A new pid namespace sysctl: vm.memfd_noexec to control the behavior of X bit.For example, if a container has vm.memfd_noexec=2, then memfd_create() without MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL will be rejected. 4> A new security hook in memfd_create(). This make it possible to a new LSM, which rejects or allows executable memfd based on its security policy. Change history: v8: - Update ref bug in cover letter. - Add Reviewed-by field. - Remove security hook (security_memfd_create) patch, which will have its own patch set in future. v7: - patch 2/6: remove #ifdef and MAX_PATH (memfd_test.c). - patch 3/6: check capability (CAP_SYS_ADMIN) from userns instead of global ns (pid_sysctl.h). Add a tab (pid_namespace.h). - patch 5/6: remove #ifdef (memfd_test.c) - patch 6/6: remove unneeded security_move_mount(security.c). v6:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221206150233.1963717-1-jeffxu@google.com/ - Address comment and move "#ifdef CONFIG_" from .c file to pid_sysctl.h v5:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221206152358.1966099-1-jeffxu@google.com/ - Pass vm.memfd_noexec from current ns to child ns. - Fix build issue detected by kernel test robot. - Add missing security.c v3:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221202013404.163143-1-jeffxu@google.com/ - Address API design comments in v2. - Let memfd_create() to set X bit at creation time. - A new pid namespace sysctl: vm.memfd_noexec to control behavior of X bit. - A new security hook in memfd_create(). v2:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220805222126.142525-1-jeffxu@google.com/ - address comments in V1. - add sysctl (vm.mfd_noexec) to set the default file permissions of memfd_create to be non-executable. v1:https://lwn.net/Articles/890096/ [1] https://crbug.com/1305267 [2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=type%3Dbug-security%20memfd%20escalation&can=1 [3] https://lwn.net/Articles/781013/ Daniel Verkamp (2): mm/memfd: add F_SEAL_EXEC selftests/memfd: add tests for F_SEAL_EXEC Jeff Xu (3): mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC mm/memfd: Add write seals when apply SEAL_EXEC to executable memfd selftests/memfd: add tests for MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL MFD_EXEC include/linux/pid_namespace.h | 19 ++ include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/memfd.h | 4 + kernel/pid_namespace.c | 5 + kernel/pid_sysctl.h | 59 ++++ mm/memfd.c | 56 +++- mm/shmem.c | 6 + tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 341 ++++++++++++++++++++- 9 files changed, 489 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 kernel/pid_sysctl.h base-commit: eb7081409f94a9a8608593d0fb63a1aa3d6f95d8 -- 2.39.0.rc1.256.g54fd8350bd-goog