Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:45:59 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?Adri=E1n?= Herrera Arcila 
        <adrian.herrera@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com,
        peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf stat: fix unexpected delay behaviour
Message-ID: <Y5p8V1jkuE6MguRM@leoy-yangtze.lan>
References: <20220729161244.10522-1-adrian.herrera@arm.com>
 <20220729161244.10522-2-adrian.herrera@arm.com>
 <e3e123db-5321-c96e-1753-27059c729640@arm.com>
 <Y5iPsjF/lEsEldU8@kernel.org>
 <CAM9d7cj=Pu2QAONzd2JSVzd_X9DakeV=khcFGD_d-ES5zrx+KQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <Y5ngs0bh/R8xPFvo@kernel.org>
 <Y5nyYeVWpLA/IH1E@leoy-yangtze.lan>
 <Y5oJRXnlRju3gDxl@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y5oJRXnlRju3gDxl@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 02:35:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

[...]

> > I don't know anything for eBPF counter, so this is why I am still a bit
> > puzzle which way is right to do (bind vs separate eBPF counters).  But
> > I personally prefer to let eBPF counter to respect delay, so it's fine
> > for me to apply Namhyung's patch.
> 
> "I'm fine" can be read as an Acked-by, right? :-)

Yes, have sent my Reviewed tag on Namhyung's patch.

Thanks,
Leo