Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <2a413c11-5e5f-7aa2-4734-78cabf393ba2@kernel.dk>
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2022 08:12:59 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.5.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 0/8] block, bfq: extend bfq to support multi-actuator
 drives
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc:     Arie van der Hoeven <arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com>,
        linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rory Chen <rory.c.chen@seagate.com>,
        Glen Valante <glen.valante@linaro.org>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
References: <20221209094442.36896-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
 <A0328388-7C6B-46A4-A05E-DCD6D91334AE@linaro.org>
 <0bcf7776-59d7-53ef-bfd0-449940a05161@kernel.dk>
 <PH7PR20MB50589A941F3F5A50C872E264F1E39@PH7PR20MB5058.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
 <7125ff61-bf11-6f8c-8496-f2603371c214@kernel.dk>
 <3479E7A6-8CAD-4A32-A0BB-00A851883EA7@linaro.org>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In-Reply-To: <3479E7A6-8CAD-4A32-A0BB-00A851883EA7@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 12/15/22 8:04 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> 
> 
>> Il giorno 13 dic 2022, alle ore 18:17, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> ha scritto:
>>
>> Please don't top post...
>>
>> On 12/13/22 10:10?AM, Arie van der Hoeven wrote:
>>> We understand being conservative but the code paths only impact on a
>>> product that is not yet in market.  This is version 10 spanning months
>>> with many gaps waiting on review.  It's an interesting case study.
>>
>> That's a nice theory, but that's not how code works. As mentioned, the
>> last version was posted 1-2 weeks later than would've been appropriate
>> for inclusion.
>>
> 
> So, what's the plan?

Looks like 1/8 and 8/8 still need Damien to review it, then queue up for
6.3 when ready. Not sure why this is even a question, it just means that
inclusion is pushed a release out as it missed the current merge window.

-- 
Jens Axboe