Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <f11ec176-35b8-6e8a-a9a1-63f73a000d13@quicinc.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:57:31 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.6.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dp: do not complete dp_aux_cmd_fifo_tx() if
 irq is not for aux transfer
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>, <agross@kernel.org>,
        <airlied@gmail.com>, <andersson@kernel.org>, <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        <dianders@chromium.org>, <robdclark@gmail.com>, <sean@poorly.run>,
        <vkoul@kernel.org>
CC:     <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com>, <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <1671129159-31105-1-git-send-email-quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>
 <ca15a54b-8040-5e4f-a78e-12b7f8a554e1@linaro.org>
 <CAE-0n53bREwEMV4aP=ySPuPP8mMbDr=Unbjw_bW0MNN7hTsWRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <d41e29a9-5da6-3843-5018-9674e7d56505@linaro.org>
From:   Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <d41e29a9-5da6-3843-5018-9674e7d56505@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 12/15/2022 1:15 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 15/12/2022 22:10, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-12-15 10:46:42)
>>> On 15/12/2022 20:32, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>>>>        if (!aux->cmd_busy)
>>>>                return;
>>>>
>>>>        if (aux->native)
>>>> -             dp_aux_native_handler(aux, isr);
>>>> +             ret = dp_aux_native_handler(aux, isr);
>>>>        else
>>>> -             dp_aux_i2c_handler(aux, isr);
>>>> +             ret = dp_aux_i2c_handler(aux, isr);
>>>>
>>>> -     complete(&aux->comp);
>>>> +     if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED)
>>>> +             complete(&aux->comp);
>>>
>>> Can you just move the complete() into the individual handling functions?
>>> Then you won't have to return the error code from dp_aux_*_handler() at
>>> all. You can check `isr' in that function and call complete if there was
>>> any error.
>>
>> I'd prefer we apply my patch and pass the irqreturn_t variable to the
>> caller of this function so spurious irqs are shutdown. Should I send it
>> as a proper patch?
> 
> I'm for handling the spurious IRQs in a proper way. However I believe 
> that it's not related to the issue Kuogee is trying to fix.
> 
> Thus I think we should have two separate patches: one fixing the EDID 
> corruption issue (for which the proper fix is !isr check, IIUC) and the 
> irqreturn_t. And for the irqreturn_t it might be beneficial to move 
> complete() call to the dp_aux_foo_handler(). Or might be not. That would 
> depend on the patch itself.

Ack.
> 
>