Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 17:52:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 17:52:13 -0500 Received: from e21.nc.us.ibm.com ([32.97.136.227]:51902 "EHLO e21.nc.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 17:51:57 -0500 Message-ID: <3C1147F2.4070103@us.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 14:51:30 -0800 From: "David C. Hansen" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6+) Gecko/20011206 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: "Udo A. Steinberg" , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: release() locking In-Reply-To: <3C10D83E.81261D74@delusion.de> <3C10FDCF.D8E473A0@zip.com.au> <3C11394D.90101@us.ibm.com> <3C113D78.F324F1B9@delusion.de> <3C113FB1.2000AFF1@zip.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: >"Udo A. Steinberg" wrote: > >>I guess there's something wrong with the changes you made, and it only >>shows with the modifications that Andrew made - and since he says he >>only fixed some bits of the code, the broken bits must have been there >>before. >> >Maybe so. Can you identify the exact kernel version at which >the problem started? > The release() functions patch went into pre3. It looks like Jens' bio changes went into pre4. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/