Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221207154939.2532830-1-jeffxu@google.com> <20221207154939.2532830-4-jeffxu@google.com>
 <202212080821.5AE7EE99@keescook> <CALmYWFuKR538vHxqYH1p6mb9iShOohf5bpHZXSfUN4KQHYiwaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <Y5yS8wCnuYGLHMj4@x1n> <CALmYWFsDhX76zbcyhYAW-u0BBwD+m+TKpt4_pZTMt+22zHhrGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20221216094259.bec91e4abd6cf54a05ce2813@linux-foundation.org>
 <CALmYWFsNp87a5uVQUAb4PG0khFN8Xxd=ibh9Q7g-Y0XW1Mn-8Q@mail.gmail.com> <202212161233.85C9783FB@keescook>
In-Reply-To: <202212161233.85C9783FB@keescook>
From:   Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:46:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CALmYWFuENPRvCAOF6of=Ufct5jjAbJ=iDyH7eODhdbm24uAK3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, jeffxu@chromium.org,
        skhan@linuxfoundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
        dverkamp@chromium.org, hughd@google.com, jorgelo@chromium.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, jannh@google.com,
        linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:35 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 10:11:44AM -0800, Jeff Xu wrote:
> > Once per boot seems too little, it would be nice if we can list all processes.
> > I agree ratelimited might be too much.
> > There is a feature gap here for logging.
> >
> > Kees, what do you think ?
>
> I agree once per boot is kind of frustrating "I fixed the one warning,
> oh, now it's coming from a different process". But ratelimit is, in
> retrospect, still too often.
>
> Let's go with per boot -- this should be noisy "enough" to get the
> changes in API into the callers without being too much of a hassle.
>
Agreed.  Let's go with per boot.

Hi Andrew, what is your preference ? I can send a patch  or you
directly fix it in mm-unstable ?

Thanks
-Jeff

> --
> Kees Cook