Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20221217044436.4138642-1-davidgow@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221217044436.4138642-1-davidgow@google.com>
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 17 Dec 2022 12:59:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CANiq72nsTR0Ez4_q_J=Vhoy+SACwnNzRVLKx6_707mP8N6VgGA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] rust: arch/um: Rust support for UML
To:     David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
        llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com>,
        Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 5:44 AM David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
>
> This series adds support for building and running code in the Rust
> programming language under x86_64 UML kernels.

Thanks for all your work and support on getting KUnit/UML + Rust ready
(long before we landed in mainline!).

> This series is currently based on the uml/next branch: I'm happy to
> rebase it next year once we're past the 6.2 merge window (though it
> applies cleanly to torvalds/master at the moment). Equally, it
> should be possible to take these changes in via the rust tree instead,
> but since it's mostly UML Makefile changes, it probably makes more sense
> for it to go in via the uml tree.

Agreed.

> Also note that this series marks UML as a "maintained" architecture for
> Rust support. It's definitely my intention to keep this working, but if

That is great -- thanks for stepping up!

Cheers,
Miguel