Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934453AbXHPBPW (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:15:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936595AbXHPBOc (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:14:32 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:56932 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936289AbXHPBOa (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:14:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:14:26 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Herbert Xu Cc: David Howells , Satyam Sharma , Stefan Richter , Christoph Lameter , Chris Snook , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , ak@suse.de, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, wensong@linux-vs.org, horms@verge.net.au, wjiang@resilience.com, cfriesen@nortel.com, zlynx@acm.org, rpjday@mindspring.com, jesper.juhl@gmail.com, segher@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures Message-ID: <20070816011426.GD9645@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20070815142516.GB9645@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4413.1187201997@redhat.com> <20070815184520.GG9645@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070815234146.GB28775@gondor.apana.org.au> <20070815235335.GU9645@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070816001248.GA29214@gondor.apana.org.au> <20070816002310.GW9645@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070816003023.GA29447@gondor.apana.org.au> <20070816004950.GZ9645@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070816005316.GA29802@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070816005316.GA29802@gondor.apana.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 941 Lines: 23 On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:53:16AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 05:49:50PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:30:23AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > > > Thanks. But I don't need a summary of the thread, I'm asking > > > for an extant code snippet in our kernel that benefits from > > > the volatile change and is not part of a busy-wait. > > > > Sorry, can't help you there. I really do believe that the information > > you need (as opposed to the specific item you are asking for) really > > has been put forth in this thread. > > That only leads me to believe that such a code snippet simply > does not exist. Whatever... Thanx, Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/