Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Feedback-ID: i787e41f1:Fastmail
Date:   Mon, 19 Dec 2022 09:55:45 +0100
From:   Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To:     Leesoo Ahn <lsahn@ooseel.net>
Cc:     Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbnet: jump to rx_cleanup case instead of calling
 skb_queue_tail
Message-ID: <Y6AnEWWd7DQg0b6o@kroah.com>
References: <20221217161851.829497-1-lsahn@ooseel.net>
 <Y57VkLKetDsbUUjC@kroah.com>
 <a2e0e98a-1044-908a-15bc-b165ff8b23ea@ooseel.net>
 <Y6AXqOlCUy7mahgj@kroah.com>
 <403f3ea8-eeec-2a78-640e-c11c3fe28f45@ooseel.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <403f3ea8-eeec-2a78-640e-c11c3fe28f45@ooseel.net>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 05:09:21PM +0900, Leesoo Ahn wrote:
> 
> On 22. 12. 19. 16:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 04:41:16PM +0900, Leesoo Ahn wrote:
> > > On 22. 12. 18. 17:55, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 01:18:51AM +0900, Leesoo Ahn wrote:
> > > > > The current source pushes skb into dev->done queue by calling
> > > > > skb_queue_tail() and then, call skb_dequeue() to pop for rx_cleanup state
> > > > > to free urb and skb next in usbnet_bh().
> > > > > It wastes CPU resource with extra instructions. Instead, use return values
> > > > > jumping to rx_cleanup case directly to free them. Therefore calling
> > > > > skb_queue_tail() and skb_dequeue() is not necessary.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The follows are just showing difference between calling skb_queue_tail()
> > > > > and using return values jumping to rx_cleanup state directly in usbnet_bh()
> > > > > in Arm64 instructions with perf tool.
> > > > > 
> > > > > ----------- calling skb_queue_tail() -----------
> > > > >          │     if (!(dev->driver_info->flags & FLAG_RX_ASSEMBLE))
> > > > >     7.58 │248:   ldr     x0, [x20, #16]
> > > > >     2.46 │24c:   ldr     w0, [x0, #8]
> > > > >     1.64 │250: ↑ tbnz    w0, #14, 16c
> > > > >          │     dev->net->stats.rx_errors++;
> > > > >     0.57 │254:   ldr     x1, [x20, #184]
> > > > >     1.64 │258:   ldr     x0, [x1, #336]
> > > > >     2.65 │25c:   add     x0, x0, #0x1
> > > > >          │260:   str     x0, [x1, #336]
> > > > >          │     skb_queue_tail(&dev->done, skb);
> > > > >     0.38 │264:   mov     x1, x19
> > > > >          │268:   mov     x0, x21
> > > > >     2.27 │26c: → bl      skb_queue_tail
> > > > >     0.57 │270: ↑ b       44    // branch to call skb_dequeue()
> > > > > 
> > > > > ----------- jumping to rx_cleanup state -----------
> > > > >          │     if (!(dev->driver_info->flags & FLAG_RX_ASSEMBLE))
> > > > >     1.69 │25c:   ldr     x0, [x21, #16]
> > > > >     4.78 │260:   ldr     w0, [x0, #8]
> > > > >     3.28 │264: ↑ tbnz    w0, #14, e4    // jump to 'rx_cleanup' state
> > > > >          │     dev->net->stats.rx_errors++;
> > > > >     0.09 │268:   ldr     x1, [x21, #184]
> > > > >     2.72 │26c:   ldr     x0, [x1, #336]
> > > > >     3.37 │270:   add     x0, x0, #0x1
> > > > >     0.09 │274:   str     x0, [x1, #336]
> > > > >     0.66 │278: ↑ b       e4    // branch to 'rx_cleanup' state
> > > > Interesting, but does this even really matter given the slow speed of
> > > > the USB hardware?
> > > It doesn't if USB hardware has slow speed but in software view, it's still
> > > worth avoiding calling skb_queue_tail() and skb_dequeue() which work with
> > > spinlock, if possible.
> > But can you actually measure that in either CPU load or in increased
> > transfer speeds?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> I think the follows are maybe what you would be interested in. I have tested
> both case with perf on the same machine and environments, also modified
> driver code a bit to go to rx_cleanup case, not to net stack in a specific
> packet.
> 
> ----- calling skb_queue_tail() -----
> -   11.58%     0.26%  swapper          [k] usbnet_bh
>    - 11.32% usbnet_bh
>       - 6.43% skb_dequeue
>            6.34% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
>       - 2.21% skb_queue_tail
>            2.19% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
>       - 1.68% consume_skb
>          - 0.97% kfree_skbmem
>               0.80% kmem_cache_free
>            0.53% skb_release_data
> 
> ----- jump to rx_cleanup directly -----
> -    7.62%     0.18%  swapper          [k] usbnet_bh
>    - 7.44% usbnet_bh
>       - 4.63% skb_dequeue
>            4.57% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
>       - 1.76% consume_skb
>          - 1.03% kfree_skbmem
>               0.86% kmem_cache_free
>            0.56% skb_release_data
>         0.54% smsc95xx_rx_fixup
> 
> The first case takes CPU resource a bit much by the result.

Ok, great!  Fix up the patch based on the review comments and add this
information to the changelog as well.

thanks,

greg k-h