Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 19 Dec 2022 13:57:50 -0700
From:   Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>,
        Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@huawei.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/selftests: Add test for event filtering on
 function name
Message-ID: <Y6DQTvOrHRZ8gjDz@google.com>
References: <20221219183106.518341498@goodmis.org>
 <20221219183214.075559302@goodmis.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221219183214.075559302@goodmis.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 01:31:08PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> With the new filter logic of passing in the name of a function to match an
> instruction pointer (or the address of the function), add a test to make
> sure that it is functional.
> 
> This is also the first test to test plain filtering. The filtering has
> been tested via the trigger logic, which uses the same code, but there was
> nothing to test just the event filter, so this test is the first to add
> such a case.
> 
> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>