Received: by 2002:a05:6358:f14:b0:e5:3b68:ec04 with SMTP id b20csp3459918rwj; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 19:23:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4U4ye2HQeLABI7eBfCWGwowGPhF0v6aeQZLfgPf1fzQjb6FWiV1nLdrLc9KVsLcZ7teX+D X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:970b:b0:7c1:9462:2dd3 with SMTP id jg11-20020a170907970b00b007c194622dd3mr26685518ejc.70.1671506638902; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 19:23:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1671506638; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iDKqNuPAl55/2SEsa0KhJ/9eeNlT8Asn4GJDtWp5QBFfxj4sw1eHrFBj1JpEnpV3Bp v51zNbfMVAOQ9Itv59a04DilGHBs/NaX4oJk4xG4gcrrU0HGlntQnNeExrUkIShXtmG7 tsFsxSmsVMBdTgOj1geqqW6AB4GZ2o2XGe+N3VzRx/XHdF/qxGtuBEUCFEkZi74mNdHH jCWVlA4hJGMzjK1TTay3GBIpvxIYwtkNN2FP4brdgcl6x6RFLW3AoM3YpR0Cg57YwysO X6tIKbngritwyYMTWIsbE4jlUgOWS9woQfaeeyl1FvGOClbFWyLUgaFXUAnTHjRaiOHu 4RJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date :dkim-signature; bh=O38uW0vTxSxK8tvIH6taDalP5oh7NUvMww4e0LxgzMs=; b=m7k1XU9z7nO6//pG1canoqYkYjUsi8+RGxHW4/7uQz7vuW3jqH1SGbqyqpKFNPPsbS gqNw4zXW1kIk4+HVfLqKFN1j1JP9QYEVZVMmQiszU+KaxssDQOvHfAhn0+UthXl3H+WC GsfX3YppGijlhwFfE2aLjWrT/luXCODLEumzHSH1RgkAvTVW0ypXmPWOZ1Zxa7xmv8oH 6YL/MKLSYLjZr6QzdtQtADC5e6mRCrCMLYKJdgIiGLDqaNFoSpSeoMoHTlR76yYDc/5K W77jtEM2DgkcMvZbb6CDG6q3ucg3u1A/qRRfyJKdJYHiy3kNUVA79aaWhEn/fonrJKUi iSvw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=W6TYVAsd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hu10-20020a170907a08a00b007c0dcc62e49si11443735ejc.56.2022.12.19.19.23.42; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 19:23:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=W6TYVAsd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229500AbiLTDQj (ORCPT + 70 others); Mon, 19 Dec 2022 22:16:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48064 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232859AbiLTDQV (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2022 22:16:21 -0500 Received: from mail-yw1-x114a.google.com (mail-yw1-x114a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::114a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C735513FB2 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 19:16:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw1-x114a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-43611d26a97so128208047b3.7 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 19:16:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=O38uW0vTxSxK8tvIH6taDalP5oh7NUvMww4e0LxgzMs=; b=W6TYVAsdFdjy72l6R3z+9WaVEobO2ZdQYioXrCcpwEqRjSKSt1AN0ptWIKS4zt5UTM +8mcMy8SFmM5FmMwjATQiwm9RpEpPJ80th954wJk9iM7vqs7eoKgyI6qtONNh0l+q1Bl r2LMs3ZV2pNyKaXcVEPuIalAlGb9dviug5nP1bLklMamurRwyKlocGkgTyOUPgvrE7sD nCwKQN4V2hOTwzesir6wWD5TN15/RHq0FM3lMwV5/3ZX9cGW6wPbKdEM5YIsuZw0pW4E bs/VLssn/VJVLOT/lxDYaSBBd63tQn2tCXyoCWnzZRtDiAWSnmo8RzNAkVpuNUnz6lRr HYZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=O38uW0vTxSxK8tvIH6taDalP5oh7NUvMww4e0LxgzMs=; b=lXLvrYznQ3aLpO0aLdwTPquB8dcestliKiRvXfh9USJ7dm36wgrtf1xcdWUJBSswwR rj5+9xAW66ep5aYDPYf0xNnNudPKRf83vYTur/ThPjp5o5+fTKwQcr4gJBpMuGN5L468 3Batv2zFl2TKR1wYHlwJDcF7KvbExiREi+zR4bIJEaiWYlNtcPV9pYcG8kPA04i0uR4k 3ONHml7QAkkI4+JD1OREHzEQi6saA8S2Ojita+i/ejG3kMlog+8pUsyIDv99gnILAYq1 8SHn9uOBRnSJCeiUvg6FtdwjEEWVgcZ/4dVUM47gobV2PyU67kUakT7hgR9Yu9CK2AW0 KAIw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmuYmPrh5jwpmgpX6nIMpNca0ZGhe0mRpRqT4gq0FX0rw6o4iwq 4yhSergskR4TH/Gvau51Ly3glfA4Aw== X-Received: from rmoar-specialist.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:2b:7d90:c0a8:45d3]) (user=rmoar job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:9ac7:0:b0:708:c3d2:a2bd with SMTP id t7-20020a259ac7000000b00708c3d2a2bdmr12152865ybo.138.1671506179087; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 19:16:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 03:10:23 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog Message-ID: <20221220031023.197178-1-rmoar@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v1] lib/hashtable_test.c: add test for the hashtable structure From: Rae Moar To: brendanhiggins@google.com, davidgow@google.com, dlatypov@google.com Cc: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Rae Moar Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add a KUnit test for the kernel hashtable implementation in include/linux/hashtable.h. Note that this version does not yet test each of the rcu alternative versions of functions. Signed-off-by: Rae Moar --- Note: The check patch script is outputting open brace errors on lines 154, 186, 231 of lib/hashtable_test.c but I believe the format of the braces on those lines is consistent with the Linux Kernel style guide. Will continue to look at these errors. lib/Kconfig.debug | 13 ++ lib/Makefile | 1 + lib/hashtable_test.c | 299 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 313 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/hashtable_test.c diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index 3fc7abffc7aa..3cf3b6f8cff4 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -2458,6 +2458,19 @@ config LIST_KUNIT_TEST If unsure, say N. +config HASHTABLE_KUNIT_TEST + tristate "KUnit Test for Kernel Hashtable structures" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on KUNIT + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + This builds the hashtable KUnit test suite. + It tests the API and basic functionality of the functions + and associated macros defined in include/linux/hashtable.h. + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/. + + If unsure, say N. + config LINEAR_RANGES_TEST tristate "KUnit test for linear_ranges" depends on KUNIT diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile index 161d6a724ff7..9036d3aeee0a 100644 --- a/lib/Makefile +++ b/lib/Makefile @@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PLDMFW) += pldmfw/ CFLAGS_bitfield_kunit.o := $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN) obj-$(CONFIG_BITFIELD_KUNIT) += bitfield_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list-test.o +obj-$(CONFIG_HASHTABLE_KUNIT_TEST) += hashtable_test.o obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) += test_linear_ranges.o obj-$(CONFIG_BITS_TEST) += test_bits.o obj-$(CONFIG_CMDLINE_KUNIT_TEST) += cmdline_kunit.o diff --git a/lib/hashtable_test.c b/lib/hashtable_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7907df66a8e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/hashtable_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,299 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit test for the Kernel Hashtable structures. + * + * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC. + * Author: Rae Moar + */ +#include + +#include + +struct hashtable_test_entry { + int key; + int data; + struct hlist_node node; + int visited; +}; + +static void hashtable_test_hash_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* Test the different ways of initialising a hashtable. */ + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash1, 3); + DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hash2, 3); + + hash_init(hash1); + hash_init(hash2); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash1)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash2)); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_empty(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry a; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + hash_init(hash); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash)); + + a.key = 1; + a.data = 13; + hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key); + + /* Hashtable should no longer be empty. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, hash_empty(hash)); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_hashed(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry a, b; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + hash_init(hash); + a.key = 1; + a.data = 13; + b.key = 1; + b.data = 2; + + hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key); + hash_add(hash, &b.node, b.key); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_hashed(&a.node)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_hashed(&b.node)); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_add(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry a, b, *x; + int bkt; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + hash_init(hash); + a.key = 1; + a.data = 13; + a.visited = 0; + b.key = 2; + b.data = 10; + b.visited = 0; + + hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key); + hash_add(hash, &b.node, b.key); + + hash_for_each(hash, bkt, x, node) { + if (x->key == a.key && x->data == a.data) + a.visited += 1; + if (x->key == b.key && x->data == b.data) + b.visited += 1; + } + + /* Both entries should have been visited exactly once. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, a.visited, 1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, b.visited, 1); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_del(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry a, b, *x; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + hash_init(hash); + a.key = 1; + a.data = 13; + b.key = 2; + b.data = 10; + b.visited = 0; + + hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key); + hash_add(hash, &b.node, b.key); + + hash_del(&b.node); + hash_for_each_possible(hash, x, node, b.key) { + if (x->key == b.key && x->data == b.data) + b.visited += 1; + } + + /* The deleted entry should not have been visited. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, b.visited, 0); + + hash_del(&a.node); + + /* The hashtable should be empty. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash)); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry entries[3]; + struct hashtable_test_entry *x; + int bkt, i, j, count; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + /* Initialize a hashtable with three entries. */ + hash_init(hash); + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { + entries[i].key = i; + entries[i].data = i + 10; + entries[i].visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key); + } + + count = 0; + hash_for_each(hash, bkt, x, node) { + if (x->key >= 0 && x->key < 3) + entries[x->key].visited += 1; + count++; + } + + /* Should have visited each entry exactly once. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3); + for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each_safe(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry entries[3]; + struct hashtable_test_entry *x; + struct hlist_node *tmp; + int bkt, i, j, count; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + /* Initialize a hashtable with three entries. */ + hash_init(hash); + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { + entries[i].key = i; + entries[i].data = i + 10; + entries[i].visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key); + } + + count = 0; + hash_for_each_safe(hash, bkt, tmp, x, node) { + if (x->key >= 0 && x->key < 3) { + entries[x->key].visited += 1; + hash_del(&entries[x->key].node); + } + count++; + } + + /* Should have visited each entry exactly once. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3); + for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry entries[4]; + struct hashtable_test_entry *x; + int i, j, count; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + /* Initialize a hashtable with three entries with key = 1. */ + hash_init(hash); + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { + entries[i].key = 1; + entries[i].data = i; + entries[i].visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key); + } + + /* Add an entry with key = 2. */ + entries[3].key = 2; + entries[3].data = 3; + entries[3].visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[3].node, entries[3].key); + + count = 0; + hash_for_each_possible(hash, x, node, 1) { + if (x->data >= 0 && x->data < 4) + entries[x->data].visited += 1; + count++; + } + + /* Should have visited each entry with key = 1 exactly once. */ + for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1); + + /* If entry with key = 2 is in the same bucket as the entries with + * key = 1, check it was visited. Otherwise ensure that only three + * entries were visited. + */ + if (hash_min(1, HASH_BITS(hash)) == hash_min(2, HASH_BITS(hash))) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 4); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 1); + } else { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3); + } +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible_safe(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry entries[4]; + struct hashtable_test_entry *x; + struct hlist_node *tmp; + int i, j, count; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + /* Initialize a hashtable with three entries with key = 1. */ + hash_init(hash); + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { + entries[i].key = 1; + entries[i].data = i; + entries[i].visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key); + } + + /* Add an entry with key = 2. */ + entries[3].key = 2; + entries[3].data = 3; + entries[3].visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[3].node, entries[3].key); + + count = 0; + hash_for_each_possible_safe(hash, x, tmp, node, 1) { + if (x->data >= 0 && x->data < 4) { + entries[x->data].visited += 1; + hash_del(&entries[x->data].node); + } + count++; + } + + /* Should have visited each entry with key = 1 exactly once. */ + for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1); + + /* If entry with key = 2 is in the same bucket as the entries with + * key = 1, check it was visited. Otherwise ensure that only three + * entries were visited. + */ + if (hash_min(1, HASH_BITS(hash)) == hash_min(2, HASH_BITS(hash))) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 4); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 1); + } else { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3); + } +} + +static struct kunit_case hashtable_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_init), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_empty), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_hashed), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_add), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_del), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each_safe), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible_safe), + {}, +}; + +static struct kunit_suite hashtable_test_module = { + .name = "hashtable", + .test_cases = hashtable_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suites(&hashtable_test_module); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); base-commit: 054be257f28ca8eeb8e3620766501b81ceb4b293 -- 2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog